<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Megan E. Smith - New Jersey Law Blog</title>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/megan-e-smith.html</link>
<description>Megan E. Smith is an Associate and member of the Divorce Group of Stark &amp; Stark. Prior to joining Stark &amp; Stark, Ms. Smith was a law clerk to The Honorable Jeanne T. Covert, J.S.C. of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Burlington County, New Jersey, where she composed tentative decisions for the Judge on motions in the Family Part. Ms. Smith concentrated her work with the Court of New Jersey on calculating child and spousal support, conducting research and making equitable distribution decisions based on pertinent law. Ms. Smith has also been trained by the Administrative Office of the Courts in mediation and conciliation. Ms. Smith also served as a judicial extern for the Chester County Court of Common Pleas in West Chester, Pennsylvania where she assisted the Masters Unit under the supervision of the Honorable Katherine B. L. Platt, in writing equitable distribution and settlement reports, observed hearings and trials regarding custody, child support, equitable distribution and juvenile delinquency matters.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:22:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:22:27 -0500</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Equitable Distribution and Domestic Partnerships in New Jersey</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>There is no such thing as a right to equitable distribution of property during the dissolution of a domestic partnership. This right only accrues to individuals who have entered into marriage or a civil union. However, as dissolution of domestic partnerships occur in the Chancery Court, equitable principles are applied and joint property or property to which both parties contributed during the partnership, may be subject to partition, i.e., division.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This issue was upheld on appeal in June 2008, wherein The Honorable John Tomasello, J.S.C. in Gloucester County, New Jersey awarded the division of a summer home the domestic partners had shared. The Order specified that interest in a house constituted the division of assets based upon equitable principles, and was not equitable distribution of property.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If the partners in the foregoing matter had converted their partnership to a civil union upon enactment of same in New Jersey, equitable distribution of property could have been properly directed as this is one of the many rights and privileges from which civil union partners in New Jersey benefit.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If you have questions regarding equitable distribution in domestic partnerships in New Jersey, or Pennsylvania, please feel free to&nbsp;<a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1251876.html">contact me</a>&nbsp;or schedule an appointment to meet with me in my firm's&nbsp;<a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1008725.html">Lawrenceville, New Jersey</a>&nbsp;or&nbsp;<a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1284673.html">Newtown, Pennsylvania</a>&nbsp;offices.&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/10/articles/divorce/equitable-distribution-and-domestic-partnerships-in-new-jersey/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/10/articles/divorce/equitable-distribution-and-domestic-partnerships-in-new-jersey/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:22:24 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>The Difference Between Civil Unions and Domestic Partnerships in New Jersey</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Before the enactment of <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1011057.html">civil unions</a> in New Jersey, the only option available to same sex couples was a domestic partnership, which provided limited benefits. Following the enactment of civil unions in New Jersey, the Domestic Partnership Act was revised such that these partnerships only became available to persons age 62 or older.  Same sex couples who had entered into domestic partnerships prior to enactment civil unions in New Jersey had the option to maintain their domestic partnership status, or convert same to a civil union.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Civil unions provide the same rights and benefits to same sex couples as marriage does to heterosexual couples. This includes a wide range of benefits including alimony, child support, and equitable distribution in the context of a divorce. If a couple with a domestic partnership does not convert the partnership to a civil union, they are not entitled to the rights and benefits, which would accrue as if they had a civil union.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If you have questions regarding civil unions and domestic partnerships in New Jersey, or Pennsylvania, please feel free to <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1251876.html">contact me</a> or schedule an appointment to meet with me in my firm's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1008725.html">Lawrenceville, New Jersey</a> or <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1284673.html">Newtown, Pennsylvania</a> offices.&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/10/articles/divorce/the-difference-between-civil-unions-and-domestic-partnerships-in-new-jersey/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/10/articles/divorce/the-difference-between-civil-unions-and-domestic-partnerships-in-new-jersey/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:45:42 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>It Gets Better: Independence Business Alliance&apos;s Philadelphia Chapter Produces Video Message</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to take this opportunity to share what I believe is a very important and timely YouTube message that was created by the Independence Business Alliance, Philadelphia&rsquo;s LGBT Chamber of Commerce. As an active member of this organization I have seen firsthand the truly inspired and positive work our group is doing in the community.&nbsp; </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The video is titled &ldquo;It gets better&rdquo; and it was produced in the hopes that it reaches LGBT youth and lets them know that each and every person has a story, and that it does in fact get better. It is hoped that the video will inspire and encourage people to be proud of who they are and keep persevering since life does get better.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>While there are other &ldquo;it gets better&rdquo; videos out there we believe that showing real people from the local area is key to inspiring kids to hang on and reach out if they need help. Many of the videos from other campaigns have been made by sports stars, and celebrities, which is fabulous, but their message doesn&rsquo;t always translate to the average student. This video hopes to show that there are regular people in their community who have been in their shoes and have made it.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>You can find the video <a href="http://www.youtube.com/ibaphiladelphia">here</a> or by searching for &ldquo;IBA it gets better&rdquo; on YouTube.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/02/articles/divorce/it-gets-better-independence-business-alliances-philadelphia-chapter-produces-video-message/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/02/articles/divorce/it-gets-better-independence-business-alliances-philadelphia-chapter-produces-video-message/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:17:58 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Governor Corzine Prohibits Enforcement of Palimony Agreements Unless in Writing</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>On his last night as Governor of the State of New Jersey, Governor Corzine has supposedly signed into law a bill prohibiting the enforcement of &quot;palimony&quot; agreements unless such agreements are in writing (S-2091/ACS for A4296, 3833 [Scutari, Cardinale, Stender,Carroll/Stender, Carroll]).&nbsp; The passage of this bill has an important impact on non-dissolution family law, where persons in long-term committed relationships sans &quot;marriage&quot; had the potential to make a palimony claim based upon a promise to support if the relationship went south.&nbsp; While palimony law is primarily contract based, the new bill will require any such &quot;promise to support&quot; to be set forth in writing.&nbsp; It will be interesting to see if a mere letter or email will meet this new requirement or if same will be reduced to terms similar to pre-nuptial agreements.<br />
&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2010/01/articles/divorce/governor-corzine-prohibits-enforcement-of-palimony-agreements-unless-in-writing/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2010/01/articles/divorce/governor-corzine-prohibits-enforcement-of-palimony-agreements-unless-in-writing/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:24:07 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>New Rule Eliminates Need for Personal Information on Divorce Court Documents</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Under the new Rules 1:38-7 Confidential Personal Identifies must be redacted from all documents filed with the Court except a Case Information Statement, its attachments, and the Confidential Litigant Information Sheet. Litigants now must certify to the Court that no such identifiers are being filed outside of the afore referenced documents.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
Personal Identifiers include:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Social Security Number</li>
    <li>Drivers License Number</li>
    <li>Vehicle Plate Number</li>
    <li>Insurance Policy Number</li>
    <li>Active Financial Account Number</li>
    <li>Active Credit Card Number</li>
</ul>
<p>You can however refer to an account by last 4 digits if necessary to distinguish from another account. <em><strong>What this means:</strong></em> Get out your black sharpie and mark up those docs before submitting them to the Court.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/10/articles/divorce/new-rule-eliminates-need-for-personal-information-on-divorce-court-documents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/10/articles/divorce/new-rule-eliminates-need-for-personal-information-on-divorce-court-documents/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:16:07 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>The Railroad Retirement Act: Partition of TIER II Annuity Benefits</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><em>This is the sixth and final installment of a six-part blog series focused on the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA). You can read the full series <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/admin/mt-xsearch.cgi?blog_id=295&amp;search_key=keyword&amp;search=The+Railroad+Retirement+Act%3A&amp;Search.x=13&amp;Search.y=7">here</a>.</em><br />
&nbsp;<br />
ERISA does not apply to RRA annuities. Thus, the railroad Retirement Board (RRB)will accept a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) only if it provides for an annuity partition that is valid under the RRB&rsquo;s regulations.&nbsp; However, a QDRO is not required to effect an annuity partition if appropriate language is incorporated into the divorce decree or court-approved property settlement agreement.</p>
<p>If you or your spouse have been railroad employees and thus may be eligible for a RRA annuity, it is strongly recommended that you speak to a legal professional to ensure that these unique benefits are properly accounted for and distributed incident to a divorce.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/10/articles/divorce/the-railroad-retirement-act-partition-of-tier-ii-annuity-benefits/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/10/articles/divorce/the-railroad-retirement-act-partition-of-tier-ii-annuity-benefits/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:09:40 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>The Railroad Retirement Act: Tier I Benefits Upon Divorce</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><em>This is the fifth installment of a six-part blog series focused on the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA). You can read the full series <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/admin/mt-xsearch.cgi?blog_id=295&amp;search_key=keyword&amp;search=The+Railroad+Retirement+Act%3A&amp;Search.x=13&amp;Search.y=7">here</a>.</em><br />
&nbsp;<br />
Although Tier I benefits are not divisible, an eligible divorced spouse can receive an annuity similar to the non-divisible Tier I annuity under the RRA.&nbsp; This is in addition to any divisible portion of the employee&rsquo;s Tier II annuity awarded by way of equitable distribution by Court Order.&nbsp; Unlike an equitable distribution award, which provides the former spouse a share of the employee&rsquo;s Tier II annuity, the payment of a Tier I type annuity to an eligible divorced spouse does not reduce the amount of the employee&rsquo;s annuity.&nbsp; This is similar to SSA benefits available to a former spouse where the parties had been married for 10 years or more.<br />
<br />
If you or your spouse have been railroad employees and thus may be eligible for a RRA annuity, it is strongly recommended that you speak to a legal professional to ensure that these unique benefits are properly accounted for and distributed incident to a divorce.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/09/articles/divorce/the-railroad-retirement-act-tier-i-benefits-upon-divorce/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/09/articles/divorce/the-railroad-retirement-act-tier-i-benefits-upon-divorce/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:06:53 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>The Railroad Retirement Act: Other RRA Components</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><em>This is the fourth installment of a six-part blog series focused on the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA). You can read the full series <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/admin/mt-xsearch.cgi?blog_id=295&amp;search_key=keyword&amp;search=The+Railroad+Retirement+Act%3A&amp;Search.x=13&amp;Search.y=7">here</a>.</em></p>
<p>Below is a list of several other components related to the Railroad Retirement Act:</p>
<ol>
    <li><strong>Supplemental Annuity:</strong>&nbsp; Railroad employees who complete twenty five (25) years of service and commenced services before 1981 may receive a supplemental annuity under section 2(b) fo the RRA, which ranges between $23 to $43 per month.&nbsp; This component is divisible upon divorce.</li>
    <li><strong>Vested Dual Benefit:</strong>&nbsp; Railroad employees who meet certain vesting requirements and are fully insured under the RRA and SSA prior to 1975 are eligible for an additional benefit amount.&nbsp; This component is divisible upon divorce.</li>
    <li><strong>Overall Minimum Increase</strong>:&nbsp;&nbsp; If an employee&rsquo;s annuity under the RRA is less than the amount that would be received under the SSA, the employee&rsquo;s annuity may be increased so that the employee receives at least as much as would be received under SSA.&nbsp; The amount of this increase is divisible.</li>
</ol>
<p><br />
If you or your spouse have been railroad employees and thus may be eligible for a RRA annuity, it is strongly recommended that you speak to a legal professional to ensure that these unique benefits are properly accounted for and distributed incident to a divorce.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/09/articles/divorce/the-railroad-retirement-act-other-rra-components/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/09/articles/divorce/the-railroad-retirement-act-other-rra-components/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:01:58 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>The Railroad Retirement Act: Tier II Benefits</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><em>This is the third installment of a six-part blog series focused on the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA). You can read the full series <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/admin/mt-xsearch.cgi?blog_id=295&amp;search_key=keyword&amp;search=The+Railroad+Retirement+Act%3A&amp;Search.x=13&amp;Search.y=7">here</a>. </em></p>
<p><br />
Tier II benefits are based solely upon railroad industry service and earnings (i.e. it does not take years/earnings outside of industry employment into account, unlike Tier I benefits).&nbsp; Tier II benefits are calculated under section 3(B) of the RRA.&nbsp; Tier II annuity benefits are divisible as property.&nbsp; Moreover, of all RRA annuity components, Tier II benefits are the only benefits that may continue to be paid to a former spouse after the death of the employee.<br />
<br />
<br />
If you or your spouse have been railroad employees and thus may be eligible for a RRA annuity, it is strongly recommended that you speak to a legal professional to ensure that these unique benefits are properly accounted for and distributed incident to a divorce.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/08/articles/divorce/the-railroad-retirement-act-tier-ii-benefits/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/08/articles/divorce/the-railroad-retirement-act-tier-ii-benefits/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:08:09 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>The Railroad Retirement Act: Tier I Benefits</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><em>This is the second installment of a six-part blog series focused on the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA). You can read the full series <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/admin/mt-xsearch.cgi?blog_id=295&amp;search_key=keyword&amp;search=The+Railroad+Retirement+Act%3A&amp;Search.x=13&amp;Search.y=7">here</a>. <br />
</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Tier I annuity benefits are determined according to earnings and career service.&nbsp; To qualify for Tier I benefits, an employee must have worked a minimum of ten (10) years in the railroad industry.&nbsp; Tier I benefits become payable when the employee reaches the retirement age as established by the Social Security Act (SSA), or reaches the age of sixty (60) and has thirty (30) years of service.&nbsp; Tier I annuity benefits are non-divisible and thus not subject to equitable distribution upon divorce.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Tier I annuity benefits represent the same benefit amount that the SSA would provide the employee upon retirement.&nbsp; The Tier I component of an employee&rsquo;s RRA annuity is calculated by applying the benefit formula of the SSA to the employee&rsquo;s earnings record.&nbsp; An employee&rsquo;s earning record includes both rail industry earnings and any earnings from employment covered by the SSA.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If you or your spouse have been railroad employees and thus may be eligible for a RRA annuity, it is strongly recommended that you speak to a legal professional to ensure that these unique benefits are properly accounted for and distributed incident to a divorce.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/08/articles/divorce/the-railroad-retirement-act-tier-i-benefits/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/08/articles/divorce/the-railroad-retirement-act-tier-i-benefits/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:03:36 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>The Railroad Retirement Act: An Introduction to the Act</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><em>This is the first installment of a six-part blog series focused on the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA). You can read the full series <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/admin/mt-xsearch.cgi?blog_id=295&amp;search_key=keyword&amp;search=The+Railroad+Retirement+Act%3A&amp;Search.x=13&amp;Search.y=7">here</a>. </em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) is a federal statute that provides unique benefits for railroad workers.&nbsp; The 1974 Amendment to the RRA resulted in an annuity benefit system that is comprised of two main benefit components, generally referred to as Tier I and Tier II benefits.&nbsp; In addition, railroad employees may qualify for additional annuity components (which are described below).&nbsp; Under the RRA, railroad employees and employers pay taxes under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act (RRTA), which are in lieu of, but similar to FICA contributions.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>A railroad employee&rsquo;s monthly annuity rate is computed&nbsp; based upon length of service and earnings during their employment.&nbsp; As a result, an RRA annuity cannot be segregated, nor can a separate account be established, as property to a former spouse.&nbsp; (Note: an order dividing an employee&rsquo;s &ldquo;account&rdquo; instead of &ldquo;retirement annuity&rdquo; is not valid under the RRA).&nbsp; Moreover, the RRB cannot furnish the present value of future benefits although an estimate can be computed based upon an employee&rsquo;s service and earnings.&nbsp;&nbsp; However, the RRB does issue annual statements (BA-6 Forms) that reflect the employee&rsquo;s creditable railroad service and compensation.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If you or your spouse have been railroad employees and thus may be eligible for a RRA annuity, it is strongly recommended that you speak to a legal professional to ensure that these unique benefits are properly accounted for and distributed incident to a divorce.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/07/articles/divorce/the-railroad-retirement-act-an-introduction-to-the-act/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/07/articles/divorce/the-railroad-retirement-act-an-introduction-to-the-act/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:03:47 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Death During Divorce Proceedings</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Usually, when a spouse dies in the midst of divorce litigation, significant problems arise.&nbsp; The first is that upon the death of a spouse&nbsp; prior to entry of Final Judgment effectively terminates the divorce proceedings.&nbsp; <em>See Carr v. Carr</em>, 120 N.J. 336, 339 - 340 (1990). Thus, any right of the surviving spouse to equitable distribution under the divorce statute is extinguished.&nbsp; The result is that the surviving spouse is left to pursue his or her share of the marital assets through the probate code by way of exercise of elective share if he or she has been disinherited or the decedent was intestate.&nbsp; </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The second problem arises in that the probate code explicitly denies the election share option to a surviving spouse if: (a) at the time of death the decedent and surviving spouse were living separate and apart in separate habitations; or (b) the decedent and surviving spouse had ceased to cohabit as man and wife as a result of circumstances that would give rise to a cause of action for divorce in New Jersey. N.J.S.A. 3B:8-1.&nbsp; Thus, the surviving spouse is left to pursue relief by way of a constructive trust under quasi-contractual law, which may be established by the Court as a vehicle by which equity may be accomplished.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If your spouse or civil union partner should pre-decease you immediately preceding the commencement of divorce/dissolution litigation or in the midst thereof, it is strongly advised that you seek the advise of an attorney to ensure that your property rights are upheld and you receive proper distribution of the marital assets.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/07/articles/divorce/death-during-divorce-proceedings/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/07/articles/divorce/death-during-divorce-proceedings/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:05:03 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Incapacity During Divorce Proceedings</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>If a person becomes incapacitated during a divorce proceeding, a guardian should be appointed by the Court in order to properly to govern the individual and their property. <em>See Kingsdorf v. Kingsdorf</em>, 351 N.J. Super. 144, 146 (App. Div. 2002).&nbsp; </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In order to do so, an application to the Court by the party who wishes to be come the guardian must be made.&nbsp; Generally, when parties are in the midst of divorce litigation, the competent spouse is prohibited from becoming the guardian&nbsp;as it is usually deemed to be a conflict of interest.&nbsp; Upon appointment of a guardian by the Court, the guardian may move forward on the incapacitated spouse&rsquo;s behalf in order to negotiate and finalize the divorce proceedings. This includes, but is not limited to entering a Property Settlement Agreement and Final Judgment of Divorce.&nbsp; This may even include filing the complaint for divorce on behalf of the incapacitated spouse.&nbsp; </p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/06/articles/divorce/incapacity-during-divorce-proceedings/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/06/articles/divorce/incapacity-during-divorce-proceedings/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:08:49 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Gay Marriage Legalized in New Hampshire</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>New Hampshire has now become the 6th state to legalize same sex marriage, with Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, and Maine as its predecessors.&nbsp; In addition, New Jersey and California allow civil unions.&nbsp; The effect of the New Hampshire decision is that the state will now provide gay couples the same rights and privileges of heterosexual couples.&nbsp;&nbsp; By allowing gay marriage in lieu of a civil union, New Hampshire is providing gay couples additional protections they do not receive in New Jersey or California, as the couple may refer to each other as &ldquo;spouse&rdquo; not partner.&nbsp;&nbsp; This is especially significant to those in the military, who are essentially prohibited from obtaining health and other benefits for their civil union partners, as the result would be outing themselves.</p>
<p><br />
The laws of New Jersey recognize gay unions, whether marriage, civil unions or domestic partnerships, so long as the rights and privileges under the laws of the state granting such a union are substantially similar to those provided to a married heterosexual couple.&nbsp; Thus, not only will a same sex marriage or civil union from New Hampshire&nbsp; be recognized here, but should the marriage or civil union disintegrate, New Jersey will also provide a forum for dissolution by way of divorce if the jurisdictional requirements are met.&nbsp; </p>
<p><br />
New Jersey is currently considering a new law to allow gay marriage in lieu of civil unions. A competing measure has also been introduced to constitutionally ban gay marriage in the state, which has been met with little support.</p>
<p><br />
Which state is next?&nbsp; Possibly New York, which passed legislation legalizing gay marriage in the state assembly in April of this year.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/06/articles/divorce/gay-marriage-legalized-in-new-hampshire/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/06/articles/divorce/gay-marriage-legalized-in-new-hampshire/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 08:01:03 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>How Divorce Affects Your Heath Insurance Benefits</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This week, William Roseman, the Mayor of Carlstadt in Bergen County, New Jersey, and his former wife, were indicted for allegedly stealing health insurance benefits. One may ask, how do you steal heath insurance?&nbsp; The answer is by failing to inform your health insurance carrier of entry of the final judgment of divorce.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Generally, all carriers require notification of divorce within sixty days of entry of the final judgment, if not less.&nbsp; For insurance purposes, divorce, like marriage and birth, constitutes a life change warranting modification of the persons eligible for benefits.&nbsp; By failing to notify a health insurance or other insurance carrier of a divorce where the former spouse is no longer entitled to benefits constitutes, insurance fraud.&nbsp; If you are contemplating divorce, it is important to speak with an attorney regarding your obligations to notify insurance carriers upon entry of the divorce judgment.&nbsp; In addition, it is advisable to contact all insurance carriers to determine their notification requirements so that you can plan accordingly.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/06/articles/divorce/how-divorce-affects-your-heath-insurance-benefits/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/06/articles/divorce/how-divorce-affects-your-heath-insurance-benefits/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 08:06:34 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Gay Marriage Veto Overturned in Vermont</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This week in Vermont, the legislature overturned the Governor&rsquo;s veto of the gay marriage bill.&nbsp; The effect of this decision is that Vermont will be the fourth state in the United States to legalize gay marriage, providing gay couples the same rights and privileges of heterosexual couples.&nbsp;&nbsp; Vermont already had a statute permitting civil unions that are recognized in New Jersey, however, the bill allowing gay marriage provides additional protections as the couple may refer to each other as &ldquo;spouse&rdquo; not partner.&nbsp;&nbsp; This is especially significant to those in the military, who are essentially prohibited from obtaining health and other benefits for their civil union partners, as the result would be outing themselves.</p>
<p><br />
The laws of New Jersey recognize gay unions, whether marriage, civil unions or domestic partnerships, so long as the rights and privileges under the laws of the state granting such a union are substantially similar to those provided to a married heterosexual couple.&nbsp; Thus, not only will a same sex marriage or civil union from Vermont be recognized here, but should the marriage or civil union disintegrate, New Jersey will also provide a forum for dissolution by way of divorce if the jurisdictional requirements are met.&nbsp; </p>
<p><br />
New Jersey&rsquo;s recognition of same-sex unions even reaches beyond the United States.&nbsp; This issue was recently before the Honorable Mary C. Jacobson, P.J.F.P., of the New Jersey Superior Court in Mercer County, who held that a same-sex couple who were married in British Columbia were entitled to a divorce in New Jersey based upon the principles of comity and ordered that the Plaintiff was entitled to pursue dissolution of her same-sex marriage to the Defendant by seeking a Final Judgment of Divorce.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/04/articles/divorce/gay-marriage-veto-overturned-in-vermont/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/04/articles/divorce/gay-marriage-veto-overturned-in-vermont/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:03:28 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Gay Marriage Constitutional in Iowa</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://howappealing.law.com/07-1499.pdf">Today, in Iowa, the State Supreme Court unanimously held that prohibiting gay marriage violates the Iowa Constitution</a>. The effect of this decision is that there will be yet another state where gay couples will be entitle to the same rights and privileges of heterosexual couples. This will also mean that marriages in Iowa will be recognized here in New Jersey.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The laws of New Jersey recognize gay unions, whether marriage, civil unions or domestic partnerships, so long as the rights and privileges under the laws of the state granting such a union are substantially similar to those provided to a married heterosexual couple. Thus, not only will an Iowa gay marriage be recognized here, but should the marriage disintegrate, New Jersey will also provide a forum for these marriages to be dissolved by way of divorce if the jurisdictional requirements are met.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>New Jersey&rsquo;s recognition of same-sex unions even reaches beyond the United States. This issue was recently before the Honorable Mary C. Jacobson, P.J.F.P., of the New Jersey Superior Court in Mercer County, who held that a same-sex couple who were married in British Columbia were entitled to a divorce in New Jersey based upon the principles of comity and ordered that the Plaintiff was entitled to pursue dissolution of her same-sex marriage to the Defendant by seeking a Final Judgment of Divorce.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/04/articles/divorce/gay-marriage-constitutional-in-iowa/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/04/articles/divorce/gay-marriage-constitutional-in-iowa/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:09:27 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Pre-Nuptial Agreements</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Pre-nuptial Agreements are becoming increasingly common and are most often used when there are significant pre-marital assets, which has become a growing trend over the past several years as people are marrying later into their twenties and thirties or in cases of re-marriage. It is important to know that when entering a Pre-nuptial Agreement there are three main requirements for such Agreements in order to be valid and therefore enforceable.&nbsp; <br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p><br />
First, it is important that neither party be coerced or under duress when entering such an Agreement.&nbsp; Second, there must be an adequate level of financial disclosure of all assets and debts, so that the agreement is reasonably &ldquo;fair.&rdquo;&nbsp; Finally, it is important that both parties receive independent representation by counsel.<br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p><br />
Pre-nuptial Agreements, while constituting a contract between two competent adults, are generally binding on both parties behalf when the above criteria is met.&nbsp; However, they are still subject to the same loop holes of any agreement related to persons who are or plan to be married. Justification for modification of such agreements generally requires that changes be unanticipated, substantial and non-temporary. <br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p><br />
In order to ensure that a Pre-Nuptial Agreement is properly executed and meets all requirements so that it may be enforceable if challenged, it is important that each party consult with an attorney, especially as each Agreement and enforcement thereof is fact sensitive and determined on a case by case basis.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/03/articles/divorce/prenuptial-agreements/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/03/articles/divorce/prenuptial-agreements/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:00:06 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Income Averaging in Your Divorce</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>When making a determination regarding child support or alimony (i.e. spousal support), each party is required to submit information reflecting their incomes, including current pay stubs, W-2s, and tax returns.&nbsp; What is important to know is that where a person&rsquo;s income fluctuates substantially from year to year, such as in situations where a party owns his or her own business or receives varying bonuses or commissions, there is case law in the State of New Jersey supporting the implementation of income averaging.&nbsp; <br />
<br />
Income averaging consists of averaging a party&rsquo;s last three or five years of income for the purposes of determining his or her income in lieu of simply looking at that party&rsquo;s year to date income or last year&rsquo;s tax returns.&nbsp; This method is becoming more and more important given our current economic climate and incomes, bonuses, commissions have substantially declined over the past year and the unemployment rate continues to increase.&nbsp; <br />
<br />
To determine whether or not income averaging may be beneficial in the calculation of child support or alimony in any individual case, you should consult with an attorney before making application for calculation or re-calculation of any support obligation.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/02/articles/divorce/income-averaging-in-your-divorce/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/02/articles/divorce/income-averaging-in-your-divorce/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:05:27 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Social Security Benefits &amp; Child Support Obligations</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Differentiating between the type of social security benefits received by the recipient or obligor of child support is important because some benefits qualify as income, thus effecting the amount of child support he or she is required to pay or is eligible to receive.&nbsp; Moreover, some benefits may be payable to a child of a parent receiving social security benefits, which effects the child support obligations of both parents.<br />
<br />
<u>Social Security Income (SSI):</u><br />
SSI is a means-tested benefit.&nbsp; A government benefit is &ldquo;means-tested&rdquo; if eligibility for the benefit or its amount is determined on the basis of the income or resources of the recipient.&nbsp; Thus, SSI benefits are not considered income to the recipient for the purposes of determining a support award, such the calculation of child support under the New Jersey Child Support Guidelines.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br />
<br />
<u>Social Security Disability (SSD):</u><br />
SSD payments represent money which an employee has earned during his employment and that which his employer has paid for the employee&rsquo;s benefit into a common trust fund under the Social Security Act.&nbsp; The purpose of SSD payments is to replace income lost due to the employee&rsquo;s inability to work upon becoming disabled.&nbsp; Thus, SSD payments are a substitute for earned income and constitute a non-means-tested benefit such that this benefit is included as income to the recipient for the purposes of determining a support award, such as the calculation of child support under the New Jersey Child Support Guidelines.&nbsp; <br />
<br />
Children of recipients of SSD benefits may be eligible to receive auxiliary benefits until they turn eighteen.&nbsp; If a child is receiving an auxiliary benefit under SSD, this may be deducted from the payor&rsquo;s child support obligation.&nbsp; If the SSD benefit received by the child is greater than the <u>total</u> amount of support obligation, then the child support amount should be 0 under the New Jersey Child Support Guidelines (i.e. no child support is due and owing).</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/01/articles/divorce/social-security-benefits-child-support-obligations/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/01/articles/divorce/social-security-benefits-child-support-obligations/</guid>
<category>Divorce</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:02:54 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Megan E. Smith</dc:creator>

</item>

</channel>
</rss>
