<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Gary S. Forshner - New Jersey Law Blog</title>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/gary-s-forshner.html</link>
<description>Gary S. Forshner, Shareholder, practices in the Real Estate Group.  Mr. Forshner concentrates his practice in commercial real estate, land use (zoning and planning) and real estate development.  He also handles general corporate/commercial transactions as well as the creation and approval of condominium projects and planned unit developments. He has extensive experience on behalf of the telecommunications industry, including zoning and planning, leasing, and municipal bidding.  Mr. Forshner also represents owners and developers in the residential, industrial, retail and office markets. His practice includes representation of national, international and local developers, lenders and businesses as well as charitable organizations and has served as special land use counsel to municipalities.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:33:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:21:04 -0500</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Opportunities and Profitability of Solar Energy Continues to Increase</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Renewable energy opportunities continue to exist and will likely increase drastically in the future. One of the concerns here in New Jersey is the need to extend, accelerate or expand the Solar Renewable Energy Credit (SREC) opportunities. <br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p>SRECs are those credits purchased by power companies for the production of solar energy. Given that solar energy facility production has exceeded expectations, creating a glut of SRECs available for purchase, the value of the SRECs have dropped to less than half of the pre-glut value. <br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p>The newly adopted New Jersey Energy Master Plan proposes to accelerate the purchasing obligation of utilities, or take other actions to stabilize the SREC market, and therefore may improve the value of SRECs and increase the ability to finance solar energy facilities. That, along with ongoing federal tax credits, create the opportunity for New Jersey to continue to be one of the national leaders in solar energy production, currently second only to California. <br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p>However, one significant component of solar energy facilities is the cost of the solar panels themselves. <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/12/111212144242.htm?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fearth_climate+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Earth+%26+Climate+News%29"><em><strong>A recent report conducted by Science Daily</strong></em></a> concludes that the cost of solar panels has dropped by 70% since 2009, significantly enhancing opportunities to make solar energy production a more attractive investment for those producing and selling energy as well as those building net-metered energy facilities, providing energy for on-site use. <br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p>For the foregoing reasons, opportunities and profitability of solar energy continues to increase and should be considered by most property owners, including those that might have declined to pursue solar energy as recently as a few months ago. Below is the link to the Science Daily article discussing the huge drop is the cost of solar panels.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/12/articles/real-estate/opportunities-and-profitability-of-solar-energy-continues-to-increase/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/12/articles/real-estate/opportunities-and-profitability-of-solar-energy-continues-to-increase/</guid>
<category>Building</category><category>Green Law</category><category>Products &amp; Services</category><category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:33:11 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>New Jersey Prosecutor Determines that Deliberations via E-mail by Municipal Officials Violates the New Jersey Open Public Meetings Act</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>To the extent there was any doubt, a recent article in the <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/nj/index.jsp?slreturn=1">New Jersey Law Journal</a> reports that a third county prosecutor has determined that deliberations via email of municipal action by a quorum of municipal officials about government business violates the New Jersey Open Public Meetings Act (commonly known as the Sunshine Law). As in the cases of the Cape May County and Burlington County Prosecutors, the Gloucester County Prosecutor declined to pursue an action, notably because the incidents in question were deemed to be incidental and unintentional and the penalty for a first offense is merely $100, with penalties up to $500 for subsequent violations of the Sunshine Law.<br />
<br />
Where this becomes more relevant is in the possible challenge to municipal action where the deliberations take place outside public scrutiny via email. Given that emails discussing government business are subject to scrutiny under the Open Public Records Acts, we can and should anticipate greater inquiry and possible challenge to municipal actions based upon violations of Sunshine Law.  <br />
<!--EndFragment--></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/09/articles/real-estate/new-jersey-prosecutor-determines-that-deliberations-via-email-by-municipal-officials-violates-the-new-jersey-open-public-meetings-act/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/09/articles/real-estate/new-jersey-prosecutor-determines-that-deliberations-via-email-by-municipal-officials-violates-the-new-jersey-open-public-meetings-act/</guid>
<category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:05:52 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>What is NJR Clean Energy Ventures?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1010646.html">&nbsp;Gary Forshner</a>, Shareholder in Stark &amp; Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1011048.html">Real Estate, Zoning and Land Use Group</a>, meets with Chris Savastano, Director of Commercial Development for NJR Clean Energy Ventures understand what <a href="http://www.njresources.com/about/njr-clean-energy-ventures/index.asp">NJR Clean Energy Ventures</a> is and what type of projects they are familiar with.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/27054919" width="400" height="225" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/27054919">What is NJR Clean Energy Ventures?</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user1319205">Stark &amp; Stark</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/green-law/what-is-njr-clean-energy-ventures/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/green-law/what-is-njr-clean-energy-ventures/</guid>
<category>Building</category><category>Green Law</category><category>Products &amp; Services</category><category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:15:42 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>New Jersey League of Municipalities Subject to Public Records Request</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1011048.html">real estate</a> industry has seen a lot of changes over the past several years, and now, for those in the state of New Jersey, there is one more. In the matter of <u>Fair Share Housing Center Inc. v. N.J. State League of Municipalities</u>, the New Jersey Supreme Court took what at first blush might have been thought an unusual decision yesterday, declaring that the New Jersey League of Municipalities is a &ldquo;public agency&rdquo; possessing &ldquo;government records&rdquo; and therefore is subject to disclosure under the Open Public Records Act. The League is a nonprofit, unincorporated association representing all of New Jersey&rsquo;s 566 municipalities, which includes over 13,000 municipal officials and over 560 mayors.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The League is the lobbying arm of New Jersey&rsquo;s municipalities and is supported in large part from public funding in the form of membership dues. Additionally, its employees participate in the Public Employees&rsquo; Retirement System, after The League was declared a public agency for that purpose by a 1955 Attorney General Opinion. Given that the lobbying done by The League on behalf of municipalities throughout the state of New Jersey, which until now the documentation for was private, one would expect a treasure-trove of information to become available to those seeking to challenge the lobbying and other efforts of The League in the future.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In this instance, Fair Share Housing was seeking information regarding the League&rsquo;s position opposing affordable housing regulations proposed by the New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing (COAH). Therefore, all COAH regulations adopted in the past 10 years have been declared unconstitutional. The latest regulations are on appeal before the New Jersey Supreme Court challenging the latest determination of unconstitutionality. The League has largely been supportive of these unconstitutional regulations and has opposed reasonable attempts at legislation and regulations enforcing a municipality&rsquo;s obligations to zone for reasonable opportunity for housing for all of the residents of New Jersey. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Here in my firm's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1008725.html">Lawrenceville, New Jersey</a> office, I expect this decision to be a source of conversation among our attorneys. If you have questions about how this decision could impact you and your business, feel free to <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1010646.html">contact me</a> to discuss this matter in more detail. </p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/real-estate/new-jersey-league-of-municipalities-subject-to-public-records-request/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/real-estate/new-jersey-league-of-municipalities-subject-to-public-records-request/</guid>
<category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:07:36 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Earthquake in New Jersey? Why Building Codes are Important Even on the East Coast</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Minutes ago we here in <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1008725.html">Lawrenceville, New Jersey</a> and <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1284673.html">Newtown, Pennsylvania</a> felt the earth shake&hellip;literally. An earthquake measured at 5.9 on the Richter scale, centered in Mineral, Virginia (just outside of Richmond), was felt along significant parts of the East Coast.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Developers, property owners, architects, engineers and frankly all of us are to be thankful for building code requirements that consider earthquakes as an element of structural design, not only here in New Jersey, but throughout the entire nation.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>While structural design and building codes in California for instance must pay far more attention to the possibility and severity of earthquakes, all building codes are required to consider the impact of natural events (including wind and earthquakes) no matter how uncommon such natural events might be. Without such building code requirements, there could have been far more damage than the building shaking and buzz around the office we felt here in New Jersey.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/real-estate/earthquake-in-new-jersey-why-building-codes-are-important-even-on-the-east-coast/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/real-estate/earthquake-in-new-jersey-why-building-codes-are-important-even-on-the-east-coast/</guid>
<category>News &amp; Events</category><category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:45:37 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Recent Trends in the Solar Industry</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1010646.html">&nbsp;Gary Forshner</a>, Shareholder in Stark &amp; Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1011048.html">Real Estate, Zoning and Land Use Group</a>, meets with Chris Savastano, Director of Commercial Development for <a href="http://www.njresources.com/about/njr-clean-energy-ventures/index.asp">NJR Clean Energy Ventures </a>to discuss the recent trends in the solar industry.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/27054267" width="400" height="225" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/27054267">Recent Trends in the Solar Industry</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user1319205">Stark &amp; Stark</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/green-law/recent-trends-in-the-solar-industry/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/green-law/recent-trends-in-the-solar-industry/</guid>
<category>Building</category><category>Green Law</category><category>Products &amp; Services</category><category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 08:13:40 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>What is Needed in Order to Make a Solar Project Work?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1010646.html">Gary Forshner</a>, Shareholder in Stark &amp; Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1011048.html">Real Estate, Zoning and Land Use Group</a>, meets with Chris Savastano, Director of Commercial Development for <a href="http://www.njresources.com/about/njr-clean-energy-ventures/index.asp">NJR Clean Energy Ventures</a> to discuss the components needed in order to make a solar project work.&nbsp;</p>
<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/27053936" width="400" height="225" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/27053936">What is needed in order to make a solar project work?</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user1319205">Stark &amp; Stark</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/green-law/what-is-needed-in-order-to-make-a-solar-project-work/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/green-law/what-is-needed-in-order-to-make-a-solar-project-work/</guid>
<category>Green Law</category><category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:08:29 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>What Are The Property Owner&apos;s Rights When Multiple Approvals Exist?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In the first published decision of its kind, the Appellate division in the matter of <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/uploads/file/Price v Martinetti (HL133999).pdf"><em>Price v. Martinetti </em></a>asks the question whether a property owner having land use approval to develop land loses the right develop under the first approval in the event a second approval for a different development scheme is subsequently granted. <br />
<br />
In this instance the court concludes that a landowner generally retains the right to develop the property under either development approval. Under certain instances that did not apply in the <em>Price </em>decision, the court alluded to the possibility that it might reach a different conclusion, but generally, a property owner holding an approval will be able to develop under the original development plan should the landowner choose, notwithstanding an approval for a different development scheme granted subsequently. <br />
&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/real-estate/what-are-the-property-owners-rights-when-multiple-approvals-exist/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/real-estate/what-are-the-property-owners-rights-when-multiple-approvals-exist/</guid>
<category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 08:11:16 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Different Types of Solar Energy Projects</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1010646.html">Gary Forshner,</a> Shareholder in Stark &amp; Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1011048.html">Real Estate, Zoning and Land Use Group</a>, meets with Chris Savastano, Director of Commercial Development for <a href="http://www.njresources.com/about/njr-clean-energy-ventures/index.asp">NJR Clean Energy Ventures</a> to discuss the different types of solar projects and how each one works.&nbsp;</p>
<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/27052429" width="400" height="225" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/27052429">What are the different types of solar projects?</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user1319205">Stark &amp; Stark</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/green-law/different-types-of-solar-energy-projects/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/green-law/different-types-of-solar-energy-projects/</guid>
<category>Building</category><category>Green Law</category><category>Products &amp; Services</category><category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 08:38:37 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Tax Incentives for Renewable Energy Projects</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Renewable energy projects, including wind, solar, biomass, etc., continue to rely upon critical tax and other incentives to be cost effective. In the future such incentives may prove unnecessary but now, during the relative infancy of the renewable energy industry, projects would not proceed absent such incentives. <br />
<br />
Federal legislation has been introduced to extend the 30 % tax credits for offshore wind projects past the current expiration at the end of 2011. As the industry matures, costs and efficiency of renewable energy projects improve, but for now if we are to reduce carbon footprint (greenhouse gases), emissions and the geo-political impacts of fossil fuels, these tax incentives continue to be a necessary component of this industry that is creating important job opportunities and reducing energy costs.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/green-law/tax-incentives-for-renewable-energy-projects/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/green-law/tax-incentives-for-renewable-energy-projects/</guid>
<category>Building</category><category>Green Law</category><category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 08:03:07 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>How Does Solar Energy Production Work?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1010646.html">Gary Forshner</a>, Shareholder in Stark &amp; Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1011048.html">Real Estate, Zoning and Land Use Group</a>, meets with Chris Savastano, Director of Commercial Development for <a href="http://www.njrcleanenergyventures.com/">NJR Clean Energy Ventures</a> to discuss how solar energy production works.</p>
<p><iframe width="400" height="225" frameborder="0" src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/26931061"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/26931061">How Does Solar Energy Production Work?</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user1319205">Stark &amp; Stark</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/real-estate/how-does-solar-energy-production-work/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/real-estate/how-does-solar-energy-production-work/</guid>
<category>Building</category><category>Green Law</category><category>Products &amp; Services</category><category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:07:56 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>East Windsor Will Serve As Largest Private Solar Power Plant in Western Hemisphere</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>How does one get the Western Hemisphere&rsquo;s largest private solar power generation plant approved? <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/uploads/file/GSF - NJ_com - 6_15_11(1).pdf">Teamwork, diligence, professionalism and consensus building. </a><br />
<br />
Over the past few months, I had the honor of working with a terrific team of professionals, who having put all critical requirements in place, obtained municipal land use approval for the western hemisphere&rsquo;s largest solar power plant. Planning Board approval was granted after just 6 weeks from filing of the application due to terrific consensus building and outstanding support, from local officials. <br />
<br />
The $60,000,000, 50-acre solar farm will produce an astounding 18 million kilowatts of power annually; enough to power the equivalent of 1,500 homes. Moreover, the project reduces greenhouse gases by over 12 metric tons, the equivalent of taking almost 2,500 cars off the road.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/06/articles/real-estate/east-windsor-will-serve-as-largest-private-solar-power-plant-in-western-hemisphere/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/06/articles/real-estate/east-windsor-will-serve-as-largest-private-solar-power-plant-in-western-hemisphere/</guid>
<category>News &amp; Events</category><category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:36:39 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Time of Application Rule</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>We not only celebrated May 5, 2011 with the traditional Cinco de Mayo celebrations, but those in the development community celebrated the day as the date on which a new statute, commonly known as the Time of Application Rule, became effective. This new provision modifies the New Jersey Municipal Land Use Law to lock in development regulations as of the filing of an application. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Under the old Time of Decision Rule, a developer was bound by all development regulations in effect, not coincidentally, at the time of the decision. This rule applies common sense to the regulation of municipal land use in New Jersey by making those ordinance provisions in effect at the time of submission of an application binding and not subject to change, except for ordinances relating to health and public safety. While reaching consensus with local officials is always a useful objective in the pursuit of development approvals, whether or not to approach such officials before an application is filed will need to be considered anew in light of the Time of Application Rule. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>You can access a copy of the Time of Application rule online <a href="http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2010/Bills/PL10/9_.HTM">here</a>. <br />
&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/05/articles/real-estate/time-of-application-rule/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/05/articles/real-estate/time-of-application-rule/</guid>
<category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 08:50:17 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>New Jersey Senate and Assembly approved Senate Bill No. 1, Eliminates Council on Affordable Housing</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The Senate and Assembly approved <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/uploads/file/S-1_amended thru 1-10-11.pdf">Senate Bill No. 1 (S1)</a> proposing to eliminate the Council on Affordable Housing (COAH). By requirement of the New Jersey Supreme Court dating to 1975, municipalities are required to zone in a manner providing for a reasonable opportunity for development of affordable housing (also commonly known as Mt. Laurel housing). S1 proposes to replace the existing procedures for providing for affordable housing, largely eliminating COAH and the State's responsibility in ensuring that municipalities satisfy their Mt. Laurel obligation. Governor Christie has publicly vowed to conditionally veto S1 for various reasons, including that it contains municipal requirements or &quot;quotas&quot; for satisfying its Mt. Laurel obligation. However, New Jersey Courts have thus far consistently held that without so-called quotas, municipalities can skirt their obligations to provide for reasonable opportunities for affordable housing by simply eliminating residential zoning or otherwise frustrating residential development. Accordingly, the conditional veto anticipated from the Governor is likely to be deemed to be unconstitutional should it be enacted into law.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
While the law proposes to eliminate COAH, as of now that body is the functioning agency responsible for overseeing municipal affordable housing obligations. However, the Courts previously declared, for the 2nd time that COAH's long delayed regulations are unconstitutional and required COAH to adopt constitutional regulations under a fast approaching deadline. As of yet, it is understood that COAH has not even begun to draft the Court ordered regulations at least in part due to the pending legislation proposed to end COAH's role in the process. <br />
&nbsp;<br />
It has now been over a decade since New Jersey and its respective municipalities have been in compliance with their constitutional obligations to provide for a reasonable opportunity for affordable housing. COAH, the Legislature, the Governor and the Courts are on a collision course with regard to these obligations. Various interest groups are geared up to legally challenge any affordable housing regulation or legislation. At a minimum, the next several months or more will continue to be rocky until the issue is settled, at least with some likely action by the Courts.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/01/articles/real-estate/new-jersey-senate-and-assembly-approved-senate-bill-no-1-eliminates-council-on-affordable-housing/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2011/01/articles/real-estate/new-jersey-senate-and-assembly-approved-senate-bill-no-1-eliminates-council-on-affordable-housing/</guid>
<category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:07:52 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Wastewater Management Planning (WQMP) Rules</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>On March 24, 2010, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Commissioner Bob Martin signed Administrative Order (AO) No. 2010-03, temporarily delaying the draconian impact of the latest Water Quality Management Planning (WQMP) rules adopted by the DEP. (You can view the AO online <a href="http://198.138.68.115/siteimages/file/legislative/2010-03_ADMINISTRATIVE_ORDER.pdf">here</a>).&nbsp; The WQMP rules in effect largely delegate authority for water quality management planning to the various counties and further to the municipalities in the absence of timely county action. Absent submission and DEP approval of a wastewater management plan on behalf of each county by a date certain results in suspension of any existing wastewater management plan and effectively puts a halt on nearly all development in that county. To date DEP has extended the foregoing dates on a county by county ad hoc basis, leaving developers at great risk of a moratorium during the already troubling economic times. The AO extends the deadline for submission of the wastewater management plans for all counties until April 7, 2011 and prohibits withdrawal of wastewater service area designations applicable to a particular property or the plan itself prior to that date as well, potentially giving counties, property owners and developers some breathing room by delaying (but not eliminating) the most problematic aspect of the rules. However, there is nothing in the AO's extension that stops counties or the DEP from submitting or approving wastewater management plans sooner than April 7, 2011, despite the prohibition on withdrawal of any wastewater service area designation or plan before April 7, 2011. <br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p>As for the substance of the WQMP rules, there remains various troubling aspects. Indeed, for example, the rules and the policies being implemented under the rules will likely result in significantly reducing lands located within designated sewer service areas as well as impose onerous engineering and legal requirements on the application for and limitations on the approval and use of individual wastewater disposal (septic) systems. Given that treating wastewater (sewerage) via sanitary sewer systems is commonly accepted to be safer and more efficient than septic systems, the rules do far more to regulate and limit land use and development than to protect the environment. Also troubling is the fact that millions of dollars of land value and development rights will be lost by removing property from sewer service areas, yet this can be accomplished by the DEP and the counties without notice to the property owner or developer. <br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p>Accordingly, it is critical for land owners and developers to closely monitor wastewater management planning and advocate for inclusion in sewer service areas where appropriate in order to avoid the potential impact on development opportunities and land values. </p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2010/03/articles/real-estate/wastewater-management-planning-wqmp-rules/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2010/03/articles/real-estate/wastewater-management-planning-wqmp-rules/</guid>
<category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:28:43 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Governor Christie Suspends the Work of The Council on Affordable Housing (COAH) For 90 Days</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This afternoon Governor Christie signed an executive order suspending the work of the Council on Affordable Housing (COAH) for 90 days, except as necessary, in order to prevent the loss of affordable housing opportunities. The executive order calls for a five person task force to be appointed by the Governor. The task force is charged with studying various aspects of affordable housing and reporting to Governor within 90 days. </p>
<p>You can view a copy of the executive order <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/uploads/file/Governor Christie Executive Order - 2_9_10.pdf">here</a>. Municipalities are constitutionally required to exercise their zoning discretion to allow for reasonable opportunities for affordable housing. Under the Fair Housing Act, COAH was created for the purpose of creating and enforcing those obligations. Unfortunately, most on all sides of the debate over affordable housing have agreed that COAH has fallen far short of it's obligations and created at least as many problems as it has opportunities. Indeed, State Senator Raymond Lesniak has introduced legislation seeking to abolish COAH and create totally new mechanisms for creation of affordable housing. Where and how this issue will end remains to be seen, but certainly the Governor and Legislature are shaking up the &quot;house&quot; as relates to affordable housing. </p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2010/02/articles/real-estate/governor-christie-suspends-the-work-of-the-council-on-affordable-housing-coah-for-90-days/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2010/02/articles/real-estate/governor-christie-suspends-the-work-of-the-council-on-affordable-housing-coah-for-90-days/</guid>
<category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:33:19 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Governor Corzine To Sign Economic Stimulus Act of 2009</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This week Governor Corzine is scheduled to sign the Economic Stimulus Act of 2009. Amongst other things, the bill will exempt projects receiving preliminary approval from the municipal board by July 1, 2010 from the non-residential development, i.e., COAH, fee. The bill also has a provision for a partial refund of such COAH fees paid under bill A-500 (the 2.5%), but only gives a party 120 days from the bill's effective date to make application for the refund. The bill will also provide economic redevelopment and growth grants (ERGG) in certain areas and will expand the eligibility for Urban Transit Hubs to add a mixed-use component that can receive a tax credit.<br />
&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/07/articles/real-estate/governor-corzine-to-sign-economic-stimulus-act-of-2009/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/07/articles/real-estate/governor-corzine-to-sign-economic-stimulus-act-of-2009/</guid>
<category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:07:06 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Follow-Up To Senate Economic Growth Committee Approval of Bill for Conversion of Age-Restricted Communities</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/03/articles/real-estate/senate-economic-growth-committee-approves-bill-for-conversion-of-agerestricted-communities/">On March 2, 2009 I&nbsp;wrote a blog</a> discussing the Senate Economic Growth Committee's approval of a bill for conversion of Age-Restricted Communities. As expected over the past several weeks, Governor Corzine conditionally vetoed the bill providing for conversion of age-restricted residential properties (commonly referred to as the 55+ bill). The conditional veto would adopt the bill upon 2 conditions: <br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px;">1) Amend the bill to require a firm 20% set-aside for affordable housing (COAH or Mt. Laurel Housing) as opposed to the 20% being a cap on the amount of affordable housing; and <br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px;">2) Granting municipal boards discretion to decline a conversion if they are not satisfied that the conversion will not cause substantial detriment to the public good and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the zone plan and zone ordinance.&nbsp; <br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p>The bill now requires the legislature to amend the bill in accordance with the foregoing requirements.&nbsp; A copy of the Governor's Conditional Veto is available online <a href="http://www.njba.org/legislative/Age_restricted_conditional_veto.pdf">here</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/05/articles/real-estate/followup-to-senate-economic-growth-committee-approval-of-bill-for-conversion-of-agerestricted-communities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/05/articles/real-estate/followup-to-senate-economic-growth-committee-approval-of-bill-for-conversion-of-agerestricted-communities/</guid>
<category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 09:01:53 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>New Jersey Division of Taxation Add New Regulations to Sales Tax</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Effective December 1, 2008, landscaping services, certain flooring installation services and alarm or security system installations are subject to sales tax. Sales taxes must be collected and remitted by the prime contractor or subcontractor supplying the services. Additional information about the new regulations from the New Jersey Division of Taxation can be accessed online <a href="http://www.state.nj.us/treasury/taxation/pdf/constructionnotice.pdf">here</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/03/articles/real-estate/new-jersey-division-of-taxation-add-new-regulations-to-sales-tax/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/03/articles/real-estate/new-jersey-division-of-taxation-add-new-regulations-to-sales-tax/</guid>
<category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:05:13 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Senate Economic Growth Committee Approves Bill for Conversion of Age-Restricted Communities</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Under a bill unanimously approved by the Senate Economic Growth Committee on February 26, 2009, municipalities would be permitted to voluntarily convert age-restricted (55-plus, senior housing), approved real estate developments to non-age restricted units upon application by developers agreeing to set aside a portion of the project as affordable housing. The conversions would be subject various constraints, including time limitations to undertake the conversion (25 months from the enactment of the bill), the requirement that there are no deposits on units and no units have been conveyed, as well as various other constraints and flexibility built into the bill to accommodate the conversion without negatively impacting existing owners, contract purchasers, the municipality and community at large, as well as future non-aged restricted purchasers of units within the development. Existing age-restricted developments either completely or partially sold would not be impacted by this bill. <br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p><br />
An identical bill has been introduced in the New Jersey State Assembly and referred to the Housing and Local Government Committee.<br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p><br />
The bill as approved by the Senate Economic Growth Committee and introduced in the Assembly may be accessed online <a href="http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2008/Bills/S3000/2577_R1.PDF">here</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/03/articles/real-estate/senate-economic-growth-committee-approves-bill-for-conversion-of-agerestricted-communities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/03/articles/real-estate/senate-economic-growth-committee-approves-bill-for-conversion-of-agerestricted-communities/</guid>
<category>Real Estate</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:17:22 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gary S. Forshner</dc:creator>

</item>

</channel>
</rss>
