How to Handle a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing

no picture

Thomas S. Onder, member of Stark & Stark's Bankruptcy & Creditor's Rights group, was featured in the article How to Handle a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing for the August 25, 2008 edition of NJ Biz.

 

In the wake of the recent high profile bankruptcies of companies such as Linens 'n Things and Boscov's more and more companies are feeling the need to file for bankruptcy protection. Mr. Onder discusses the steps companies can take in order to retain key suppliers and employees in uncertain economic conditions. You can read the full article here. (PDF)

What Franchisors Can Expect in Bankruptcy

no picture

In light of the recent high profile bankruptcy filings of dining establishments such as Bennigans and Steak N Ale, Adam Siegelheim leads a discussion with Bankruptcy & Creditor’s Rights Attorneys Timothy Duggan and Thomas Onder to outline what franchisors need to understand about the bankruptcy process.

In this podcast the franchise and bankruptcy attorneys discuss: what happens to the franchise’s intellectual property assets; what are the responsibilities of the franchisees; how does the bankruptcy filing impact the restrictive covenants which exist and how do potential third-party purchasers of the system come into play.

You can download the full podcast here. (10.3 MB)
 

Boscov's Bankruptcy And What Their Suppliers Should Understand

no picture
The bankruptcy filing today of Boscovs Department Stores further demonstrates how consumers have been hurt by the housing downturn, job losses and higher costs for food and fuel. Following on the heels of Linens N Things and The Sharper Image, Boscov's cited decreased consumer spending and will immediately close 10 of its 49 stores, most of which are in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

Suppliers to these and other similarly situated retail outlets have substantial rights to reclaim merchandise shipped to a debtor prior to their bankruptcy filing. Today's podcast on Boscov's Bankruptcy will explain those rights.

Linens-N-Things Bankruptcy

no picture
Three Critical Issues for Suppliers
On May 2, 2008, Linens-N-Things and its affiliated entities filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the District of Delaware. Linens-N-Things has a number of different suppliers that are effected by this bankruptcy filing. Following are three (3) very important issues that suppliers should know about to ensure their rights in the bankruptcy proceeding.


RECLAMATION
Certain suppliers have the right to reclaim goods that they have shipped a bankrupt debtor. A creditor may attempt reclamation of their goods sold in the ordinary course under Bankruptcy Code § 546 (c). However a supplier must move quickly on their right to reclaim any of these goods that are lost. The supplier must make a demand in writing for reclamation of the goods no later than 45 days after delivery. If the 45 day period has not expired as of the date of the filing of the bankruptcy petition, the supplier will be provided an additional 20 days to demand reclamation of the goods sold.


ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE
In addition to reclamation, suppliers also have the ability to seek a priority administrative expense under Bankruptcy Code §503 (b). This claim is for the “value of any goods” received in the ordinary course of business by a debtor within 20 days prior to the bankruptcy filing. To obtain this expense, the supplier must make a request, often by motion. A supplier who exercises their rights, can be in a better position than unsecured creditors since the Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization cannot be confirmed unless all administrative expense claims are paid in cash on the effective date of the bankruptcy plan.


PROOF OF CLAIM
In addition to the other rights mentioned, suppliers should also file a Proof of Claim for any amounts due and owing prior to the petition date. The Bankruptcy Code allows creditors to be paid with other similar situated creditors through the Bankruptcy Plan. The Proof of Claim deadline is usually provided at the beginning of the case and will allow creditors to exercise these rights. It is important to file a Proof of Claim properly and prior to the deadline.


For my information on supplier’s rights in the Linens-N-Things bankruptcy case or any other bankruptcy matters, please feel free to contact either Tom Onder or Jeff Posta in the Bankruptcy &  Creditor’s Rights Group at (609) 219-7458 or tonder@stark-stark.com, and (609) 791-7021 or jposta@stark-stark.com.

Five Things You Should Know About Bankruptcy

no picture

Bankruptcy filings increased in February 2008 by 18% from January, and by 28% from a year earlier. In fact, February was the busiest month for filings since Congress overhauled bankruptcy law in October 2005 with the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act ("BAPCPA").  This increase in filings also increases the chance that you will be faced with bankruptcy issues. Some of the revisions contained in BAPCPA that you may encounter are set forth below.

 

Pre-Petition Shipments Of Goods. BAPCPA created substantial additional rights for suppliers that sold goods to a debtor prior to the bankruptcy filing.  Section 503(b) of the Bankruptcy Code allows administrative-expense status to all claims for "the value of any goods" received in the ordinary course of business by a debtor within 20 days before the bankruptcy filing. The supplier must request administrative-expense status. By doing this, the supplier is in a better position than unsecured creditors to be paid, since a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization cannot be confirmed unless administrative claims are fully paid in cash on the effective date of the plan. Unsecured creditors typically receive only a fraction of their claims.

 

Reclamation Claims.Suppliers may now exercise their right to reclaim goods 45 days after the debtor's receipt of the goods under Section 546(c) of the Bankruptcy Code. Prior law limited the period for reclamation to 10 days after receipt of the goods. A written demand for reclamation of such goods must be made not later than 45 days after delivery. Suppliers must move quickly or their right to reclaim will be lost. If the 45-day period has not expired as of the filing of a bankruptcy case, a supplier will have an additional 20 days after the filing of the case to demand reclamation of the goods sold. A reclamation demand is "subject to the prior rights" of a holder of a security interest in the goods sold.

 

Preferences:  Small Claim Threshold and Venue. Creditors of a debtor who received small payments during the 90-day pre-bankruptcy preference look-back period are protected by BAPCPA.  Aggregate payments received by a creditor not exceeding $5,000 are now exempt from preference liability.  Also, creditors who have received potential preference payments in an amount less than $10,000 will no longer have to defend themselves in the home bankruptcy court of the debtor, which could be located in another state.  Instead, such preference actions must now be commenced in the creditor's home district.  

 

Preferences: Ordinary Course Defense. Prior to BAPCPA, to avoid preference liability, a creditor had to prove that the payment it received from the debtor was made in the ordinary course of business of both parties and that the payment was made in accordance with "ordinary" industry terms.  In other words, a creditor had to establish both defenses to prevail.  BAPCPA made it easier to defend a preference action, since a creditor now has to prove only one of the two defenses, thereby reducing the creditor's burden of proof.

 

Commercial Leases. Under Section 365(d) of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor may "assume" an unexpired lease of nonresidential real property with court approval. A debtor cannot assume parts of a lease; it must assume the entire lease, with all of its burdens and benefits. Before BAPCPA, a debtor could obtain unlimited extensions up until the end of the bankruptcy case to decide whether to assume or reject a commercial real estate lease. Debtors with a large number of commercial real estate leases therefore had great flexibility in determining which locations to keep open or close down in proposing a plan of reorganization.  BAPCPA now requires a debtor to decide whether to assume or reject within a maximum of 120 days after the commencement of the bankruptcy case. This period may be extended up to 90 days for cause, but cannot be extended further unless the lessor consents to a greater extension of time.

Stark & Stark Attorney to Present at 10th Annual William H. Gindin Bankruptcy Bench Bar Conference

no picture
Timothy P. Duggan, Shareholder and Chair of Stark & Stark's Bankruptcy & Creditor's Rights Group will present at this year's 10th Annual William H. Gindin Bankruptcy Bench Bar Conference and will discuss the sale of assets in bankruptcy cases.


The conference will take place Friday May 2, 2008 at the Bunswick Hilton, in New Brunswick, New Jersey. Additional information, registration forms and CLE credit information can be found here.

Enforcing Liens on Real Estate Projects

no picture
Jeffrey S. Posta, Shareholder and member of Stark & Stark's Bankruptcy & Creditor's Rights Group authored the article, Enforcing Liens on Real Estate Projects: Creditors must be diligent to protect their rights, for the January 14, 2008 edition of the New Jersey Law Journal.

The article discusses the dramatic decrease in home sales over the past few years and the consequential downturn in homebuilding. The increased number of companies subsequently filing for bankruptcy, slashing prices, and selling assets only indicates that those still in the business need to be more aware of what the short, or possibly, long-term effects of a decrease in homebuilding can mean for their business.

You can read the full article here.

What to Do When You Receive A Bankruptcy Preference Demand Letter

no picture
Many businesses are receiving “preference” demand letters directing the return of money received from bankrupt debtors. Among the more notable bankruptcy cases in New Jersey from where such preference demands may arise include: Best Manufacturing Group, New Jersey Affordable Homes, Rockaway Bedding, Marcal Paper Mills, Kara Homes, Elliot Building Group and Ash Holdings. Although this may seem an odd demand - return money for perfectly delivered goods or services -  the practice of recovering “preferences” in bankruptcy is allowed under the Bankruptcy Code.  However, before you go writing a check to return hard earned money, you should consult with a bankruptcy attorney to find out if the transaction qualifies for defenses, as well as your best possible negotiating position.
   

What is Preference?
A potential preference is a payment received from a debtor, made within 90 days of the bankruptcy filing.  Bankruptcy Code section 547(b) allows a bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession to avoid this payment, if the transfer was to or for the benefit of a creditor on account of an antecedent debt while the debtor was insolvent.  When Congress enacted the Bankruptcy Code, the policy behind preferences was to level the playing field for all creditors by not allowing a creditor to receive more than it would have within the debtor’s bankruptcy case. 


Proper Response to the Preference Demand Letter Critical
Although the Bankruptcy Code gives the power to recover these transfers, your business may have certain defenses to eliminate, or at least lessen, your exposure. These defenses include: payments made within the ordinary course of business; contemporaneous exchange for new value; payments made outside of the 90 day preference period; settlements during the bankruptcy case; and/or payments made via C.O.D.  To determine if your transaction qualifies for one of these defenses and make the proper response, it is imperative review the account information.


Information Needed to Determine Defenses
Prior to contacting your attorney, you should gather the full payment history at least a year before the bankruptcy filing.  This information includes:
1.    all correspondence, contracts, emails and the like with the debtor;
2.    a copy of all invoices, showing invoice date, terms, and amount of each invoice;
3.    a copy of the payments received (i.e. checks, wires, cash deposit slip) and date posted to your bank account;
4.    number of days elapsed between date of invoice and date payment was received; and
5.    personnel involved with the debtor’s account, so they can advise how payments were made, applied and any unique issues with the debtor. 


Once your attorney has this information, it will raise a number of questions  For instance, are some of the payments alleged as preferential outside the 90 day period?  Or, are the payments made within the ordinary course of your industry?  However, how do you determine your industry compared to a similar industry? Do you need an expert witness?  These and many more questions should be addressed with your bankruptcy attorney prior to sending any response.   


Stay tuned for future posts within the coming weeks dealing with a more detailed discussion on specific preference defenses, including ordinary course of dealings, contemporaneous exchange for new value and industry specific issues for the building and construction, REITs and commercial developers, and other service providers.


In the interim, for more information on defending a preference action, or other bankruptcy issues, please feel free to contact Tom Onder, Stark & Stark’s Bankruptcy & Creditor’s Rights Group at (609) 219-7458 or via email a tonder@Stark-Stark.com.

Timothy Duggan Featured on The American Law Journal

no picture
Timothy P. Duggan, Chair and Shareholder of Stark & Stark's Bankruptcy & Creditor's Rights Group, will be a guest on the November 12, 2007 episode of The American Law Journal. The show will air tonight at 8:00 PM on WFMZ-TV CHANNEL 69.

The episode will feature Mr. Duggan, and weekly host Christopher Naughton, Esq., as they discuss bankruptcy filings and the recent increase in foreclosures. Mr. Duggan will focus on the important issues creditors will face due to the recent increase in foreclosures, how the increase can impact their company, and what this will mean for the future of their business.

A new battle of Waterloo is under way

no picture
Timothy P. Duggan, Shareholder and member of Stark & Starks Bankruptchy & Creditor's Rights group was quoted in the October 12, 2007 Star Ledger article, A new battle of Waterloo is under way.

You can read the full article here.

Older Entries

October 12, 2007 — Recall forces NJ meat firm to close doors

September 25, 2007 — Domino-Like Bankruptcies Offer Lessons

September 7, 2007 — Tenants Allowed to Maintain Almost "No Deductible" For Commercial Insurance Coverage

April 30, 2007 — Landlord's Beware: Fair Debt Collection Practices Act Applies to Eviction Actions

April 27, 2007 — Construction Liens- The Nub of the Matter

April 12, 2007 — Rights of Suppliers under Bankruptcy Law

April 11, 2007 — Rockaway Bedding Bankruptcy - How Does the New Bankruptcy Law Impact The Company and Their Landlords?

February 26, 2007 — Bankrupt Real Estate Tycoon Owes Large Debt

January 25, 2007 — Annuities Included in Bankruptcy Estate

October 20, 2006 — New Jersey Legal Update - Podcast # 49

August 14, 2006 — State of the Bankruptcy Court

March 31, 2006 — New Jersey Legal Update - Podcast # 32

March 11, 2006 — Another Blow to Asbestos Bankruptcies

January 31, 2006 — Third Circuit Rules Against Secured Lender on Recovery of Post-Judgment Attorney Fees

January 19, 2006 — Duggan Presenting at Due Diligence Symposium 2006

October 25, 2005 — Duggan Interviewed in NJBIZ Magazine

October 17, 2005 — Duggan Comments on New Bankruptcy Rules

October 14, 2005 — New Jersey Legal Update - Podcast # 14

October 13, 2005 — New Bankruptcy Act Will Affect Divorce Litigation

September 28, 2005 — Duggan Comments on New Bankruptcy Law on Bankrate.com

September 23, 2005 — New Bankruptcy Bill - Television Discussion With Timothy Duggan

September 23, 2005 — New Jersey Legal Update - Podcast #12

August 19, 2005 — New Jersey Legal Update - Podcast #7

July 29, 2005 — Channeling Injunction of Bankruptcy Code 524(g)

July 1, 2005 — Informal Proof of Claim: Form or Substance?

June 3, 2005 — A New Defense to Preference Litigation

May 31, 2005 — Duggan Discusses Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005

May 12, 2005 — Duggan to Speak at ICLE Seminar on Changes in Bankruptcy Law

May 10, 2005 — Alert For Leasing Companies Doing Business in New Jersey

May 9, 2005 — Two Decisions Against Equipment Lessors Will Require Adjustments to Lease Agreements

May 6, 2005 — Liquor License Lien-Short Lived Victory

April 27, 2005 — Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005

March 30, 2005 — Payment of Commission Obligation of Foreclosing Mortgagee, Not Trustee

March 14, 2005 — Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005

March 9, 2005 — Seventh Annual Bankruptcy Bench-Bar Conference - ICLE

February 10, 2005 — Forclosure Update - Delays Getting Shorter

February 8, 2005 — Good News For Secured Lenders

January 24, 2005 — Bankruptcy Trustee v. Non-Debtor Spouse - Is the Battleground State Court or Bankruptcy Court

November 30, 2004 — Court Rules Against Solvent Debtor

October 27, 2004 — Bankruptcy of a Commercial Tenant

October 25, 2004 — Bankruptcy As a Business Tool

September 24, 2004 — Equitable Distribution in Bankruptcy

September 13, 2004 — Collection Efforts - Associations