Governor Corzine signs bill creating Solar and Wind Energy Commission

no picture

Among the several pieces of “green” legislation, that Governor Jon Corzine signed just prior to leaving office was a bill (A3218) that creates a new, temporary 11-member public body to be known as the Solar and Wind Energy Commission.  This new law - approved as P.L. 2009, c. 239 - authorizes the Commission “to conduct a thorough and comprehensive study to examine State owned property and determine where solar and wind energy installations would be feasible[,]” which shall include a discussion of the financial implications of such installations, projected energy and financial savings, potential use of net metering and a host of other topics.  Although there is no limit to the number of documents that the Commission may produce under the statute relating to this study, it must submit to the Governor and the Legislature and make available to the public a final report containing its findings, conclusions and recommendations within one year after its organization.  Thirty days thereafter, the Commission shall expire.  It will be interesting to see what this year-long effort will generate.

Governor Corzine Signs Solar Farm Bill

no picture

 On January 16, 2010, just prior to leaving office as Governor, Jon Corzine signed into law what I am going to refer to as the "solar farm bill" (P.L. 2009, c. 213), which authorizes a person who owns preserved farmland to install and operate biomass, solar or wind energy generation facilities, structures and equipment on the farm for the purpose of generating power or heat.  Among other things, this bill also adds to the list of permitted activities that may be conducted on commercial farms "the generation of power or heat from biomass, solar, or wind energy" and, as such, it will serve as a nice companion to a recent amendment to the Municipal Land Use Law (P.L. 2009, c. 35), which allows a “renewable energy facility” to be located on a parcel or parcels of land owned by the same person comprising at least 20 contiguous acres within every municipal industrial zoning district, signed into law by the former Governor in March of last year.

Expiration of Permits Extended by Amendment to Permit Extension Act

no picture

On Monday, January 18, 2010, as one of his last acts before leaving office, former Governor Corzine signed an Amendment to the Permit Extension Act (A4347) (the “PEA Amendment”) further extending the validity of most land use and construction approvals and permits (hereinafter “Approvals”), which would otherwise expire, until at least December 31, 2012.  Due to the recession, the Permit Extension Act of 2008, N.J.S  40:55D-136.1, et seq., (the “PEA”) was initially adopted in 2008  to provide for a tolling of expiration for specified Approvals through at least July 1, 2010 (together with additional extensions thereafter that might apply).  In order for the validity of an Approval to be extended under the PEA, it must have been valid or issued on or after January 1, 2007.

 

The time period for validity of Approvals is now further extended by the PEA Amendment until at least December 31, 2012 before the time begins to run on the validity of an Approval.   Subsequent to December 31, 2012, permits and approvals have a phased expiration whereby any unexpired portion of the term of the Approval further extends the Approval, limited to up to six (6) months from December 31, 2012, i.e., no later than June 30, 2013. In addition to the foregoing, a developer may exercise any unexercised extension applicable to such Approval. For example, if a developer were issued a permit on November 30, 2010 that was valid for two (2) years with the right to an additional one (1) year extension, the PEA Amendment would stop the clock on the expiration of this permit that would otherwise expire on November 30, 2012 and extend the expiration of the permit from November 30, 2012 to June 30, 2013. Should the developer be timely granted the one (1) year extension applicable under this scenario, the June 30, 2013 expiration would thereby be extended until June 30, 2014.

 

The Amendment is applicable to most municipal, county, regional and state development permits and approvals, but sets forth specific exceptions and limitations.  Property owners and developers with permits and approvals that are effective on or after January 1, 2007 should seek legal advice to determine the effect the PEA and the PEA Amendment may have on their development rights.

Stark& Stark Shareholder Discusses Hamilton Square ShopRite Expansion Plans

no picture

Gary S. Forshner, Shareholder in Stark & Stark's Real Estate Zoning & Land Use Group, was quoted in the January 13, 2010 Trenton Times article, Developer shares plans for enlarged Hamilton ShopRite, and the January 14, 2010 Trenton Times article, ShopRite decision on hold in Hamilton.

The articles discuss the recent plan to renovate the ailing Hamilton Square Shopping Center and enlarge its ShopRite supermarket from 53,000 square feet to 85,789 square feet. The shopping center, located at the corner of Route 33 and Yardville-Hamilton Square Road, currently has a vacancy rate of 30 percent or more.

The plans were introduced last week to the township zoning board and a decision will be made after the board meets for a final vote on the proposal on January 26, 2010 at the Hamilton Township Municipal Building. Mr. Forshner who represents Levin Properties, which owns the site, states, "We need to make sure that the locations along Route 33 are up-to-date, well-tended and rehabilitated. You don't want to end up with a blight situation along Route 33."

New Jersey Clean Energy Program: Pay for Performance

no picture

The New Jersey Clean Energy Program administered by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities through its Office of Clean Energy offers a host of financial incentives.  Among these is the Pay for Performance Program, which is funded by the societal benefits charge authorized by the New Jersey Electric Discount and Energy Competition Act.  Under this program, a qualifying utility customer may receive up to 50% of the total cost of energy-efficient measures recommended by an energy efficiency expert, also known as a program “partner,” who the customer selects from a pre-approved list, provided that the implementation of such measures will achieve an energy savings of at least 15%.  A customer participating in the Pay for Performance Program may also receive funds to offset the cost of the program partner’s services at a rate of $0.10 per square foot up to a maximum of $50,000 or 50% of the annual energy cost of the building or facility that is the subject of the application for benefits, whichever is less.  There are also advanced measure incentives for combined heat and power under the program.

 

In order to be eligible for the Pay for Performance Program, (1) an applicant must be a customer of a regulated electric utility and/or gas utility in New Jersey, including Atlantic City Electric, Jersey Central Power & Light, Rockland Electric Company, New Jersey Natural Gas, Elizabethtown Gas, PSE&G and South Jersey Gas, and (2) the project for which an application is made must consist of one or more commercial, industrial, institutional or multi-family residential structures having over 200 kW average annual peak demand electrical usage (if the buildings are preexisting) or having at least 50,000 square feet or more of planned conditioned space (if the project calls for new construction).  Individual buildings, as well as multiple buildings in complexes owned by a single person or entity, may qualify for benefits under the program provided that they meet the above criteria.  Condominium associations may also be eligible to receive incentives for energy-efficient measures relating to common elements under this program.

New York State Energy and Development Authority to provide loans for Energy Audits and Qualified Energy Efficiency Services under Green Jobs-Green New York Program

no picture

On October 9, 2009, the New York State Legislature enacted the Green Jobs-Green New York Act of 2009 (“Green Jobs Act”) as P.L. 2009, ch. 487, amending the Public Authorities Law, to create the Green Jobs-Green New York Energy Conservation and Community Sustainability Program (“Green Jobs-Green New York Program”).  Under this new program, the New York State Energy and Development Authority (“Authority”) is empowered to award financial assistance from the Green Jobs-Green New York Revolving Loan Fund to applicants for the conduct of energy audits and the performance of qualified energy efficiency services on non-residential, residential and multi-family structures.  The Green Jobs Act defines “applicant” broadly to include any “person who owns, leases or manages a structure and who has the authority to contract for the provision of qualified energy efficiency services to such structure.” NY PUB AUTH § 1891.  However, loans for “qualified energy efficiency services,” which are also defined under the Green Jobs Act and include such building improvements as thermostat upgrades and the installation of thermal solar heat or hot water systems, are limited.  For example, loans for approved qualified energy efficiency services may not exceed $26,000.00 per applicant for non-residential structures.  Applicants applying for financial assistance relating to residential structures may only receive up to half that amount.  The cost of the energy audit may be added to the amount of the loan.  Interest rates shall lie within the Authority’s discretion, but may “be no higher than necessary to make the provision of the qualified energy efficiency services feasible.” NY PUB AUTH § 1896.
 

In addition to the provision of loans for energy audits and qualified energy efficiency services, the Green Jobs-Green New York Program requires the Authority to award grants for certain purposes and to promote employment and training services.  In the way of funding, the New York State Legislature has appropriated $112,000,000 to finance the aforesaid loan program and the Authority’s other activities.  The Authority is not expected to begin implementing the Green Jobs-Green New York Program until the spring of 2010.

Legislature Defines Inherently Beneficial Use to Include Wind, Solar and Photovoltaic Energy Facilities and Structures

no picture

On November 20, 2009, Governor Jon S. Corzine signed into law Senate Bill S1303 as P.L. 2009, ch. 146, which codifies the term “inherently beneficial use,” a concept originally fashioned by the Supreme Court in Andrews v. Ocean Township Bd. of Adjustment, 30 N.J. 245 (1959) and, thereafter, expanded and refined by the judiciary over many years.  The new law, which amends Section 3.1 of the Municipal Land Use Law (L.1975, c.291, C.40:55D-4), defines inherently beneficial use to include, among other things, “a wind, solar or photovoltaic energy facility or structure.”  This will undoubtedly make it easier to obtain approvals for and install these alternative energy facilities where they are not permitted under local zoning regulations and require a use variance.  However, the text of the amendment presents a number of issues of which property owners, developers and others should be aware.
 

First, strangely missing from the new statutory definition of inherently beneficial use is any mention of religious institutions, affordable housing or certain other uses that have been long recognized as being inherently beneficial.  Although the list of uses contained in the definition is expressly stated not to be exhaustive, the omission of uses traditionally viewed as being inherently beneficial is troubling and could open the door to a reexamination of their value and purpose by municipal agencies and the courts.  Additionally, it is unclear whether the term “wind, solar or photovoltaic energy facility or structure” refers only to stand-alone facilities or to facilities that are accessory to (and situated on the same site as) other uses or structures, as well.  It also remains to be seen whether a wind, solar or photovoltaic energy facility that is connected to the grid and supplies excess energy to off-site users qualifies as inherently beneficial.

Want an Antidote to the Economic Doldrums? Start by Improving Your Lease Agreement!

no picture

Although the downturn in the economy has brought many obstacles to small business owners, it has also created opportunities that can provide leverage to foster growth and financial security for the future.   An important example of this is the give-and-take that occurs between landlord and tenant in the negotiation of new commercial leases and the renegotiation of existing ones.  Indeed, a carefully drafted, and well thought out lease agreement can serve to protect and enhance the viability of a business. 
   

In order for lease negotiations to produce the right opportunities, a business owner must develop a full understanding of its own purposes in entering into the lease, the landlord’s actual or likely positions on “big picture” issues relating to the proposed deal and, in addition, the nature and extent of the proposed uses and operations within the leased space.  This is a prerequisite to negotiations.  Of course, a business owner should also be prepared to come to the table with an open mind and a willingness to compromise and consider creative alternatives.  In such instance, the business owner may succeed in cultivating a (or improving an already positive) relationship with the building owner, as well as furthering and protecting commercial interests.  For example, a tenant with a new business may be willing to expose itself to greater liability in the event of a default by signing a personal guarantee, for example, in exchange for some up-front assistance from the landlord, such as rent concessions during the first year of the term or contributions toward the cost of fitting out the interior of the premises.  In these financial challenging and legally tumultuous times, business owners should give special consideration to safeguarding your rights in the event of insolvency or bankruptcy and in the event condemnation or destruction of the premises.  Having the ability to assign freely your interests in a lease, especially to a newly formed or reorganized business entity and sublet or otherwise transfer those interests are also of paramount importance.   In any event, by being flexible and creative, the business owner stands to create an agreeable lease arrangement and, by the same token, the financial stability that this creates will also advance the long-term interests of the landlord. This is especially true in multi-tenant environments where the stability of one business owner contributes to the stability of another and creates a commercially attractive neighborhood. 
   

It is undeniable that the economic downturn has had a considerable effect on tenancy rates in Central New Jersey and elsewhere.  If you are a business owner who has managed to survive the recession, and you are looking for leaseable space, you should take advantage of the opportunities available in the current “tenant’s market.”   No matter the size of your business, as a tenant today, you don’t necessarily have to accept a lease as proposed by a landlord or sit on an existing lease that is ripe for renegotiation.  Similarly, landlords can take affirmative steps to hold onto existing tenants and attract new ones by providing incentives and by being flexible, in the negotiating process. 
   

Whatever your interests or purposes may be, business owners should take their leases seriously, especially now, given the real potential for securing favorable new deals and restructuring existing ones.  Business owners who fail to do so or who enter the fray unprepared and without the proper tools risk losing an opportunity and, quite possibly, jeopardizing their business - a lesson that some small businesses, unfortunately, have already learned.  Indeed, given the complexities inherent in preparing and negotiating a commercial lease (many of which have not been detailed here), business owners would be well advised to seek legal counsel before entering into any such agreement.

Governor Corzine To Sign Economic Stimulus Act of 2009

no picture

This week Governor Corzine is scheduled to sign the Economic Stimulus Act of 2009. Amongst other things, the bill will exempt projects receiving preliminary approval from the municipal board by July 1, 2010 from the non-residential development, i.e., COAH, fee. The bill also has a provision for a partial refund of such COAH fees paid under bill A-500 (the 2.5%), but only gives a party 120 days from the bill's effective date to make application for the refund. The bill will also provide economic redevelopment and growth grants (ERGG) in certain areas and will expand the eligibility for Urban Transit Hubs to add a mixed-use component that can receive a tax credit.
 

How to Immediately Cut Your Company's Energy Costs and Control Energy Expenses in the Future

no picture

Vincent J. Mangini, Shareholder in Stark & Stark’s Real Estate, Zoning & Land Use group, will present a seminar entitled How to Immediately Cut Your Company’s Energy Costs and Control Energy Expenses in the Future in conjunction with New Jersey’s Clean Energy Program and its New Jersey SmartStart Buildings program. The seminar is hosted by CrunchEnergy, an energy services company dedicated to helping businesses reduce energy costs.
 

 
The seminar will be presented from 8:00 AM – 12:30 PM September 9, 2009 and September 10, 2009. The September 9th event will be held at The Villa in Mountain Lakes, New Jersey, and the September 10th event will be held at the Sheraton in Eatontown, New Jersey.

 

The seminar will provide actionable recommendations to cut energy costs immediately, while providing the insight to prepare for upcoming regulations and impending laws and current initiatives, like New Jersey’s Energy Master Plan. The material shared at the event will benefit New Jersey-based building owners, business owners, CFOs, energy managers and facilities managers - anyone who makes decisions about energy for buildings of 20K square feet or more.
Topics to be discussed include:

  • Quick and no-cost building upgrades to reduce energy consumption
  • Reducing peak demand
  • Emerging technologies and incentive opportunities
  • State Renewable Energy Tax Exemption
  • Grants and loans for energy efficient projects
  • Energy audits
  • NJ Smart Start Buildings Pay-for-Performance Programs
  • And other related topics.

 

Mr. Mangini will present the seminar with Joseph Carlamere of New Jersey SmartStart Buildings. Mr. Carlamere is involved in environmental consulting, company TRC’s design and development of the sector initiative of New Jersey’s Clean Energy Program as part of the team developing programmatic strategies that resonate to the following sectors: industrial, institutional, multi-family, higher education and hospitality. He also manages the Local Government Energy Audit Program for the NJOCE and the BPU.
 


Additional information and details on how to register for the events is available online here.
 

Older Entries

June 22, 2009 — Friends of Peapack-Gladstone v. Borough of Peapack-Gladstone Land Use Board, et al. Tolling of Development Approvals under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-21

June 16, 2009 — Schmidhausler v. Planning Board of Borough of Lake Como: Remedy for Vote by Ineligible Board Member

May 15, 2009 — Court Rules Against Property in Case Where Tenant Was Relocated But the Property Was Never Taken

May 14, 2009 — Stark & Stark Shareholder Serves as Panelist for New Jersey Law Journal Green Building in New Jersey Roundtbale Discussion

May 11, 2009 — Follow-Up To Senate Economic Growth Committee Approval of Bill for Conversion of Age-Restricted Communities

May 8, 2009 — New Jersey Supreme Court Sides With Property Owner in Dispute Over Legal Fees in Eminent Domain Case

May 5, 2009 — Commercial Landlords Beware: Questions To Ask Before Removing, Disposing or Returning Property Left By Tenants

April 29, 2009 — Redevelopment Procedures - Adequate Record

April 17, 2009 — Governor Corzine Signs Residential Development Solar Energy Systems Act Into Law

March 31, 2009 — Redeveloper Agreements - Designating the Redeveloper

March 25, 2009 — Stark & Stark Shareholders To Present Seminars At 2009 Atlantic Builders Convention

March 13, 2009 — New Jersey Division of Taxation Add New Regulations to Sales Tax

March 9, 2009 — Redevelopment Procedures - Unsworn Testimony

March 2, 2009 — Senate Economic Growth Committee Approves Bill for Conversion of Age-Restricted Communities

February 25, 2009 — Stark & Stark Shareholder to Present at 2009 NJICLE Land Use Update

February 24, 2009 — Redevelopment - Waiver of Right to Appeal

February 17, 2009 — Chapter 91 - Law Continues to Develop

February 10, 2009 — Chapter 91 Reasonableness Hearings - Good Luck

February 2, 2009 — Property Tax Assessment Audit - Are You Being Improperly Taxed?

January 29, 2009 — State Government Funding Opportunities: An invaluable resource in fiscally challenging times

January 27, 2009 — Redevelopment Plan - Amendments

January 20, 2009 — Stark & Stark Shareholder to Serve As Co-Chair of 4th Annual CEL International Eminent Domain Seminar

January 16, 2009 — Challenging Non-Residential Development Fees

December 29, 2008 — Redevelopment Agreement - Forfeiture Remedy

December 15, 2008 — Designating Property For Redevelopment Using the "A" Criteria

December 1, 2008 — Redevelopment Takings - Statutory Authority and Limitations

November 25, 2008 — Stark & Stark Shareholder Quoted in Star Ledger Article

November 19, 2008 — Going Green Should Not Increase You Tax Obligations

November 17, 2008 — Redevelopment Takings - Constitutional Authority and Limitations

November 10, 2008 — Beware What You Say, Don't Say and What You Print and Promise

November 3, 2008 — Standing to Participate in Redevelopment Challenges and Valuation Proceedings

October 30, 2008 — Legislative Initiatives in Green Building Arena Abound

October 20, 2008 — Standing To Obtain Land Use Approvals under a Redevelopment Plan

October 10, 2008 — Going Green - Here to Stay or Gone Tomorrow?

October 6, 2008 — Standing to Negotiate Property Acquisitions

October 1, 2008 — Proposed Legislation Would Allow Energy Subcode To Be More Restrictive Than National Model Codes

September 22, 2008 — Standing to Appeal From Adverse Decision Without Redevelopment Entity

September 8, 2008 — Redevelopment Plan - Implementation

September 3, 2008 — What Every builder Should Know About the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act

August 25, 2008 — Redevelopment Plan - Content

August 21, 2008 — Reduce Real Estate Taxes Through Farmland Assessment

August 18, 2008 — Master Sponsors Credited with Historic Passage of Permit Extension Act

August 12, 2008 — Update on Tax Assessments for Day Care and After School Programs

August 11, 2008 — Designation of Property as Being Necessary for Redevelopment

August 7, 2008 — Green Buildings and Environmental Sustainability - Master Plan Element

August 6, 2008 — Weighing Comparable Sales-Adjustments Matter

August 5, 2008 — Inherently Beneficial Uses - Wind, Solar and Photovoltaic Energy Facilities

July 28, 2008 — Designating Property For Redevelopment Using the "E" Criteria

July 18, 2008 — Real Estate Development From Beginning to End in New Jersey

July 15, 2008 — New Jersey Department of Transportation's Transit Village Initiative

July 3, 2008 — Supreme Court Gives Developers Leg Up

June 20, 2008 — Regulatory Hammer Strikes Again

June 17, 2008 — Legislative Update: Construction Lien Law

June 13, 2008 — Redevelopment Applications - Consistency Review

June 11, 2008 — Redeveloper Agreements

May 28, 2008 — Chapter 91 Follow Up

May 21, 2008 — Stark & Stark Shareholders to Present at New Jersey Redevelopment Authority

May 12, 2008 — Ordinance Requiring Disclosure of Political Contributions Held Unconstitutional

May 9, 2008 — Historic Preservation Statues

April 14, 2008 — Toll Bros v. Board of Chosen Freeholders: Developer May Seek to Modify Developer's Agreement Upon Changed Circumstances

April 11, 2008 — Landlord's Beware: Options to Purchase Commercial Property Strictly Adhered

April 9, 2008 — Municipality Not Estopped from requiring Property Owner to Correct Deviations from Approved Site Plan Existing at Time Certificate of Occupancy was Issued

April 8, 2008 — Landlord's Beware: Court Awarded Tenant Attorneys Fees and Double Security Deposit for Failure to Return to Tenant

March 24, 2008 — Eligibility for Property Tax Deductions

February 7, 2008 — Failure to Respond to a Tax Assessor's Chapter 91 Request May Not Bar An Appeal

January 28, 2008 — Correcting Mistakes in Tax Assessments

January 17, 2008 — Stark & Stark Attorneys to Present at Atlantic Builders Convention

January 3, 2008 — Landlord's Beware: Commercial Tenant Failure to Obtain Municipal Permits Not Grounds For Eviction

December 20, 2007 — YMCA Hires Architect for Project

October 29, 2007 — In property valuations, the taxman has the edge

September 7, 2007 — Tenants Allowed to Maintain Almost "No Deductible" For Commercial Insurance Coverage

May 10, 2007 — Mount Laurel Township v. MiPro Homes Petition Sent to United States Supreme Court

April 27, 2007 — Construction Liens- The Nub of the Matter

April 26, 2007 — More owners facing foreclosure - Many paying a price for easy credit

April 18, 2007 — Balancing Redevelopment and Property-Owner Rights

April 4, 2007 — West Windsor Rite Aid proposal grinds ahead

April 3, 2007 — Cooperation in Redevelopment

March 28, 2007 — Enlarging Time to Appeal Land Use Decisions in the Interests of Justice

March 26, 2007 — Zoning Boards Have Jurisdiction to Grant Variances from Redevelopment Plan

March 23, 2007 — City to issue its position on land seizure

February 28, 2007 — Real Estate Tax Appeals: Who Has the Burden of Proof

February 27, 2007 — Property Revaluations: Myths and Facts

January 24, 2007 — Township Asks Rite-Aid for Design Change

January 22, 2007 — Relaxed Standard of Review Applies to Density Variances

January 19, 2007 — New Jersey Legal Update - Podcast # 57

January 11, 2007 — Achieving Redevelopment through Proper Planning and Cooperation

December 11, 2006 — 2007 Land Use Update

December 8, 2006 — New Jersey Legal Update - Podcast # 53

December 7, 2006 — BREAKING NEWS - NJ Supreme Court's Decision in Mt. Laurel v. MiPro

November 30, 2006 — Trenton's Foundry Project

October 11, 2006 — Millville Planning Board Approves Drive-Thru

August 22, 2006 — When Government Inversely Condemns Property by Regulation, Magnitude of State Interest Has No Bearing Upon Just Compensation

July 19, 2006 — Court Rules Zoning Change Inconsistent Township Master Plan

June 19, 2006 — "Prompt Pay" Bill

April 3, 2006 — Forshner to Speak on Zoning and Land Use

February 16, 2006 — Legislative Update on Eminent Domain

February 13, 2006 — Wastewater and Water Quality Management Regulations

February 6, 2006 — Duggan Quoted in Trenton Times on Property Revaluation

January 30, 2006 — Mipro Case To Be Heard By New Jersey Supreme Court

January 13, 2006 — New Jersey Legal Update - Podcast # 22