<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Insurance Coverage &amp; Liability - New Jersey Law Blog</title>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/articles/insurance-coverage-liability/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 08:40:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:19:18 -0500</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Stark &amp; Stark Shareholder Comments on Protocol Overhaul</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1011454.html">Thomas B. Lewis</a>, Chair of Stark &amp;&nbsp;Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1009364.html">Employment</a> Group, was quoted in the February 26, 2010 <u>Registered Rep</u> article, <em>Some Predict Broker Protocol Overhaul</em>. The article addresses the possibility of an overhaul to the Protocol for Broker Recruiting in the wake of increased lawsuits and constant movement of advisors as they switch firms. When the protocol was first created, it was an exclusive pact between three wirehouse firms put in place to prevent expensive litigation every time an advisor switches firms. Today, there are approximately 420 signatories to the agreement, and recently, some firms are adding letters to clarify their participation in the protocol. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Mr. Lewis states that it could become very unruly if each company began including its own letters and sets its own rules as to compliance or noncompliance with the protocol. Mr. Lewis believes that the protocol will become ineffective at that point, and something has to be done as to the clarification letters because there is no telling where it may stop.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>You can read the full article online <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/uploads/file/TBL - Registered Rep - 2_26_10.pdf">here</a>. (PDF)</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2010/03/articles/employment/stark-stark-shareholder-comments-on-protocol-overhaul/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2010/03/articles/employment/stark-stark-shareholder-comments-on-protocol-overhaul/</guid>
<category>Employment</category><category>Insurance Coverage &amp; Liability</category><category>Media Placements</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 08:40:34 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stark &amp;amp; Stark</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>The Importance of Insurance Coverage in Mediating Complex Construction Claims</title>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1012188.html">Thomas J. Pryor</a>, Shareholder and Chair of Stark &amp; Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1011058.html">Insurance Coverage &amp; Liability Group</a>, has authored the article, <em>The Importance of Insurance Coverage in Mediating&nbsp; Complex Construction Claims </em>for the March 31, 2008 issue of the <u>New Jersey Law Journal</u>. <br />
<br />
You can read the full article <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/TJP NJLJ 3.31.08.pdf">here</a>.]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/04/articles/insurance-coverage-liability/the-importance-of-insurance-coverage-in-mediating-complex-construction-claims/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/04/articles/insurance-coverage-liability/the-importance-of-insurance-coverage-in-mediating-complex-construction-claims/</guid>
<category>Alternative Dispute Resolution</category><category>Insurance Coverage &amp; Liability</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 08:03:58 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stark &amp;amp; Stark</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Case Denying Coverage Has Limited Relevance</title>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1012188.html">Thomas J. Pryor</a>, Shareholder and member of Stark &amp; Stark's Insurance Coverage &amp; Liability and Litigation groups, has authored the article <em>Case Denying Coverage Has Limited Relevance: Recent appellate decision did not shore up erosion of Weedo's current relevance </em>for the February 4, 2008 issue of the <u>New Jersey Law Journal</u>. <br />
<br />
You can read the full article <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/TJP NJLJ 2.4.08.pdf">here</a>. <br />]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/02/articles/insurance-coverage-liability/case-denying-coverage-has-limited-relevance/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/02/articles/insurance-coverage-liability/case-denying-coverage-has-limited-relevance/</guid>
<category>Insurance Coverage &amp; Liability</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:02:45 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stark &amp;amp; Stark</dc:creator>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>