<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Insurance Coverage &amp; Liability - New Jersey Law Blog</title>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/articles/insurance-coverage-liability/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 08:03:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 09:28:24 -0500</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>The Importance of Insurance Coverage in Mediating Complex Construction Claims</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1012188.html">Thomas J. Pryor</a>, Shareholder and Chair of Stark &amp; Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1011058.html">Insurance Coverage &amp; Liability Group</a>, has authored the article, <em>The Importance of Insurance Coverage in Mediating&nbsp; Complex Construction Claims </em>for the March 31, 2008 issue of the <u>New Jersey Law Journal</u>. </p>
<p>You can read the full article <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/TJP NJLJ 3.31.08.pdf">here</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/04/articles/insurance-coverage-liability/the-importance-of-insurance-coverage-in-mediating-complex-construction-claims/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/04/articles/insurance-coverage-liability/the-importance-of-insurance-coverage-in-mediating-complex-construction-claims/</guid>
<category>Alternative Dispute Resolution</category><category>Insurance Coverage &amp; Liability</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 08:03:58 -0500</pubDate>
<author>rdeluca@stark-stark.com (Stark &amp; Stark)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Case Denying Coverage Has Limited Relevance</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1012188.html">Thomas J. Pryor</a>, Shareholder and member of Stark &amp; Stark's Insurance Coverage &amp; Liability and Litigation groups, has authored the article <em>Case Denying Coverage Has Limited Relevance: Recent appellate decision did not shore up erosion of Weedo's current relevance </em>for the February 4, 2008 issue of the <u>New Jersey Law Journal</u>. </p>
<p>You can read the full article <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/TJP NJLJ 2.4.08.pdf">here</a>. <br /></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/02/articles/insurance-coverage-liability/case-denying-coverage-has-limited-relevance/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/02/articles/insurance-coverage-liability/case-denying-coverage-has-limited-relevance/</guid>
<category>Insurance Coverage &amp; Liability</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:02:45 -0500</pubDate>
<author>rdeluca@stark-stark.com (Stark &amp; Stark)</author>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>