Opportunities and Profitability of Solar Energy Continues to Increase

no picture

Renewable energy opportunities continue to exist and will likely increase drastically in the future. One of the concerns here in New Jersey is the need to extend, accelerate or expand the Solar Renewable Energy Credit (SREC) opportunities.
 

SRECs are those credits purchased by power companies for the production of solar energy. Given that solar energy facility production has exceeded expectations, creating a glut of SRECs available for purchase, the value of the SRECs have dropped to less than half of the pre-glut value.
 

The newly adopted New Jersey Energy Master Plan proposes to accelerate the purchasing obligation of utilities, or take other actions to stabilize the SREC market, and therefore may improve the value of SRECs and increase the ability to finance solar energy facilities. That, along with ongoing federal tax credits, create the opportunity for New Jersey to continue to be one of the national leaders in solar energy production, currently second only to California.
 

However, one significant component of solar energy facilities is the cost of the solar panels themselves. A recent report conducted by Science Daily concludes that the cost of solar panels has dropped by 70% since 2009, significantly enhancing opportunities to make solar energy production a more attractive investment for those producing and selling energy as well as those building net-metered energy facilities, providing energy for on-site use.
 

For the foregoing reasons, opportunities and profitability of solar energy continues to increase and should be considered by most property owners, including those that might have declined to pursue solar energy as recently as a few months ago. Below is the link to the Science Daily article discussing the huge drop is the cost of solar panels.

The Installation of a Solar Energy Facility Presents a Myriad of Legal Issues

no picture

In New Jersey, solar energy facilities have become very popular, especially among businesses and residential property owners, making our State second only to California on the national stage for total solar installations. According to the 2011 Draft Energy Master Plan released by the Christie Administration this past June, there are approximately 9,000 solar photovoltaic projects within the State and most of these are located on commercial and residential sites. Specifically, as of February 28, 2011, in terms of installed capacity, commercial and residential solar projects produced approximately 240 megawatts of power and accounted for 82% of all projects statewide (with most of the remaining 51 megawatts being installed on government sites, school properties and farmland).
 

The drive by commercial establishments and property owners to offset conventional power sources with solar energy certainly comports with current State and federal energy policies.  However, the construction and operation of a solar energy facility may involve a myriad of legal issues for which the advice and counsel of a knowledgeable attorney is essential.
 

Broadly speaking, businesses and individuals interested in hosting a solar energy facility on their premises may do so either by purchasing the solar panels and related equipment outright from a solar developer pursuant to an engineering, procurement and construction contract (EPC) or by leasing the facility long-term (usually 15 to 20 years) pursuant to a power purchase agreement (PPA).  Under both types of agreements, the solar developer may offer to design, build and maintain the solar facility.
 

One threshold matter that applies equally to EPC and PPA contracts is whether to obtain a solar feasibility study for the subject property and the proposed system equipment from an independent technical professional in consultation with an attorney. A solar developer will often perform a property and equipment analysis prior to installing the facility. However, the solar developer’s feasibility study may not include everything that a commercial enterprise or property owner may want to know before committing to the purchase or rental of a solar energy facility. For example, in order for a solar energy facility to operate efficiently and productively the owner or lessee of the system may need to prune or remove trees on site or may need to secure a solar easement from a neighboring property owner to restrict the location and/or height of a building addition, landscaping or other improvements (which might otherwise block access to sunlight).
 

A solar feasibility study should also gauge whether the proposed system size will adequately serve current energy needs (as well as any anticipated change thereto that might occur in the future) and whether the roof of the existing building where the proposed facility is to be constructed and all other structural components and the electrical system can handle the load of the proposed facility. In this regard, by way of further due diligence following receipt of a solar feasibility study, a prospective owner or lessee of a solar energy system should (1) verify with its insurance agent that the proposed facility will not require an insurance upgrade; and (2) contact all companies that have supplied warranties for the roof or other building components that the proposed facility will not require any special inspections to avoid invalidation of any such warranties.
 

Another consideration integral to both EPC and PPA contracts is the procurement of land development approvals and permits for the solar installation.  Indeed, it should not be assumed that the solar developer will obtain any required land development approvals, such as site plan or variance relief (although often they will secure the building permit) or that any failure to acquire such approvals will operate to terminate an agreement with a solar developer.  Therefore, during contract negotiations, a prospective purchaser or lessee should discuss with the solar developer and resolve such matters as which party will be responsible to make application and pay for approvals or permits and whether a failure to obtain any such approvals or permits after making a good faith effort shall operate to terminate the contract.
 

The foregoing represents just a handful of the issues that may come into play when considering whether to install and operate a solar energy system.  If you are interested in learning more about EPC or PPA contracts or have a legal issue relating to solar installations that you would like to discuss, do not hesitate to contact Vincent J. Mangini, Shareholder and LEED Accredited Professional BD+C, here in our Lawrenceville, New Jersey office.

What is NJR Clean Energy Ventures?

no picture

 Gary Forshner, Shareholder in Stark & Stark's Real Estate, Zoning and Land Use Group, meets with Chris Savastano, Director of Commercial Development for NJR Clean Energy Ventures understand what NJR Clean Energy Ventures is and what type of projects they are familiar with.

What is NJR Clean Energy Ventures? from Stark & Stark on Vimeo.

Recent Trends in the Solar Industry

no picture

 Gary Forshner, Shareholder in Stark & Stark's Real Estate, Zoning and Land Use Group, meets with Chris Savastano, Director of Commercial Development for NJR Clean Energy Ventures to discuss the recent trends in the solar industry.

Recent Trends in the Solar Industry from Stark & Stark on Vimeo.

Different Types of Solar Energy Projects

no picture

Gary Forshner, Shareholder in Stark & Stark's Real Estate, Zoning and Land Use Group, meets with Chris Savastano, Director of Commercial Development for NJR Clean Energy Ventures to discuss the different types of solar projects and how each one works. 

What are the different types of solar projects? from Stark & Stark on Vimeo.

How Does Solar Energy Production Work?

no picture

Gary Forshner, Shareholder in Stark & Stark's Real Estate, Zoning and Land Use Group, meets with Chris Savastano, Director of Commercial Development for NJR Clean Energy Ventures to discuss how solar energy production works.

How Does Solar Energy Production Work? from Stark & Stark on Vimeo.

Policing 'Green' Marketing Claims: The FTC takes the next step in revising its outdated guides

no picture

Vincent J. Mangini, Shareholder and member of Stark & Stark’s Green Law Group, authored an article for the July 18, 2011 edition of the New Jersey Law Journal entitled, Policing ‘Green’ Marketing Claims: The FTC takes the next step in revising its outdated guides.
 

The article provides an overview of the the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) proposed revisions to the guide for the use of environmental marketing claims (the "Green Guides") and evaluates the FTC's decision not to include in the proposed amended and supplemental Green Guides specific guidance for sustainability claims. The article goes on to discuss legal protections afforded to corporate image advertising.

 

You can read the full article online here. (PDF)

 

Still Plenty of Time to Take Advantage of the Residential Energy Efficient Property Tax Credit

no picture

Originally created by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the Residential Energy Efficient Property Tax Credit provides a tax credit for the taxable year in an amount equal to the sum of 30% of qualifying expenditures made by the taxpayer during such year for solar electric or solar water heating systems, fuel cell property, wind energy systems or a geothermal heat pump. See 26 U.S.C. § 25D.  All qualifying expenditures must be for property used as a residential dwelling by the taxpayer located in the United States, but only qualified fuel cell property must be installed at the taxpayer’s principal residence.  This credit is applicable to qualifying property and expenditures placed in service before January 1, 2017.

NJ Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Offers Loan Monies for Energy Efficient Upgrades

no picture

As a result of funding made available to New Jersey through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the NJ Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency (NJHMFA) has introduced a number of loan programs to facilitate the construction of energy efficiency upgrades and renewable energy installations in multifamily housing.  One such program is the Multifamily Energy Efficiency Improvement Pilot (MEEIP), which provides loans for eligible energy efficiency upgrades at an interest rate of two percent (2%) to owners of certain multifamily structures.  Financing is limited to a maximum of $2,000 per unit and $500,000 per project.  An applicant who seeks funding under this program must own a multifamily building that is over 20 years old and contains at least five units and must either have an existing primary permanent mortgage with the NJHMFA or propose to renovate the building into rental housing with a NJHMFA primary permanent mortgage.  In addition, to qualify an applicant must participate in the Board of Public Utilities’ Pay for Performance Program, agree to extend affordability controls for an additional 15 years and satisfy a host of other requirements.

Solar Panels: A Statutorily Protected Power Substitute

no picture

Faced with the burden of tough economic times, more and more homeowners are looking for ways to cut costs.  While some individuals have chosen to cut back, others have chosen to seek out economically advantageous alternatives.  In particular, the search for substitutes has become increasingly important when it comes to necessary household expenditures such as heat and electricity.  Although it has become common practice for local utility companies to power community homes, low cost alternatives such as solar panels may be the wave of the future.   Accordingly, Condominium and Homeowners Association Boards may soon find themselves faced with a new set of issues never before contemplated and an understanding of the legal obligations associated with this is essential. 
 

It is important to note that New Jersey statutory law, specifically, the Planned Real Estate Development Full Disclosure Act ("PREDFDA"), N.J.S.A. 45:22A-48.2,  lays out very specific guidelines governing the installation of solar panels in common interest communities. 
 

According to the Statute, the extent to which an Association can regulate the installation of solar panels largely depends upon the type of housing unit involved and the way “roofs” are defined in the Association’s governing documents. Overall, a prohibition against solar panels is permitted in communities where the unit roofs are considered “common elements.” Conversely, solar panels cannot be prohibited in communities with single family homes or communities where the unit owners are responsible for the roofs.  However, the law provides that Associations which are required to allow solar panels may also adopt rules and regulations governing their installation.
 

In particular, the Statute provides that an Association can adopt rules governing the following items:

  1. The qualifications, certification and insurance requirements of personnel or contractors who may install the solar collectors;
  2. The location where solar collectors may be placed on roofs;
  3. The concealment of solar collectors' supportive structures, fixtures and piping;
  4. The color harmonization of solar collectors with the colors of structures or landscaping in the development; and
  5. The aggregate size or coverage or total number of solar collectors
     

If an Association decides to promulgate rules and regulations in this regard, the extent to which it may do so is limited.  The Statute states that an Association shall not adopt or enforce any rule if compliance would increase the solar panels’ installation or maintenance costs by an amount greater than 10 percent of the total cost of the initial installation, including costs of labor and equipment.  In addition, the Statute prohibits Associations from adopting or enforcing any rule which inhibits the solar panels from functioning at their intended maximum efficiency. Therefore, while an Association is given leverage to adopt certain rules and regulations, those rules and regulations must adhere to the specific guidelines expressed in the Statute. 
 

As a rule of thumb, if an Association is responsible for the roofs, it can ban solar panels.  However, if an owner is responsible for the roofs, the Association must allow solar panels, so long as the rules and regulations it has adopted are followed.  As always, it is advisable to have a professional draft or review any restrictions you intend to put into place to ensure your community’s compliance with the law.

Older Entries

December 10, 2010 — New Jersey Legislature Adopts Law Requiring State Entities to Replace Fossil Fuels with Biofuels

November 22, 2010 — HUD Releases Details on Proposed PowerSaver Pilot Program

November 11, 2010 — Federal Trade Commission Approves New Regulations for Labels on Light Bulb Packaging

November 1, 2010 — Green Marketing Claims Require Thorough Product Knowledge, Holistic Evaluation of Life Cycle Impacts and Careful Planning

October 22, 2010 — DEP Amends and Supplements Regulations To Facilitate Development of Wind Turbines and Solar Energy Facilities

October 11, 2010 — FTC Sues California firm over Deceptive Green Marketing Claims relating to LED Bulbs

October 7, 2010 — FTC Releases Proposed Revisions to Green Guides

October 1, 2010 — New Jersey Likely to See Proliferation of Solar Farms

September 21, 2010 — Understanding the Legal Risks When Marketing Green Products - Part 2

September 14, 2010 — Understanding the Legal Risks When Marketing Green Products

September 2, 2010 — Champagne Producers Plan to Reduce Carbon Emissions by Lightening the Weight of Their Bottles

August 24, 2010 — FTC Expects to Release Updates to Green Guides Before Summer's End

August 19, 2010 — California Legislature Seeks to Restrict Claims relating to the Degradability or Compostability of All Plastic Products in Advertising

August 4, 2010 — Financial Incentives for Commercialization of Clean Energy Technologies

July 29, 2010 — Being Finicky about Products and Materials Selection Criteria Is Essential to Creating a Genuinely Green Home

July 22, 2010 — Policing Unfair and Deceptive Green Advertising Claims

July 7, 2010 — Promotions East Conference - Atlantic City

June 7, 2010 — Hot and Green Legal Topics: Round 2

May 17, 2010 — New Jersey's Renewable Energy Incentive Program

May 13, 2010 — NJ Energy Star Homes Program Offers Builders Generous Financial Incentives

May 6, 2010 — Bill Extending New Energy Efficient Home Credit through December 31, 2010 Awaits Reconciliation and Signature by President

April 30, 2010 — New Law Prohibits Inclusion of Solar Panels in Calculation of Impervious Coverage

April 22, 2010 — Updates to the Federal Trade Commission's "Green Guides" May Impact Building Industry

March 2, 2010 — A Primer on Green Leases: Special considerations that permeate the negotiation process

February 16, 2010 — A Renewable Energy Facility May Require an Easement from your Neighbor