Opportunities and Profitability of Solar Energy Continues to Increase

no picture

Renewable energy opportunities continue to exist and will likely increase drastically in the future. One of the concerns here in New Jersey is the need to extend, accelerate or expand the Solar Renewable Energy Credit (SREC) opportunities.
 

SRECs are those credits purchased by power companies for the production of solar energy. Given that solar energy facility production has exceeded expectations, creating a glut of SRECs available for purchase, the value of the SRECs have dropped to less than half of the pre-glut value.
 

The newly adopted New Jersey Energy Master Plan proposes to accelerate the purchasing obligation of utilities, or take other actions to stabilize the SREC market, and therefore may improve the value of SRECs and increase the ability to finance solar energy facilities. That, along with ongoing federal tax credits, create the opportunity for New Jersey to continue to be one of the national leaders in solar energy production, currently second only to California.
 

However, one significant component of solar energy facilities is the cost of the solar panels themselves. A recent report conducted by Science Daily concludes that the cost of solar panels has dropped by 70% since 2009, significantly enhancing opportunities to make solar energy production a more attractive investment for those producing and selling energy as well as those building net-metered energy facilities, providing energy for on-site use.
 

For the foregoing reasons, opportunities and profitability of solar energy continues to increase and should be considered by most property owners, including those that might have declined to pursue solar energy as recently as a few months ago. Below is the link to the Science Daily article discussing the huge drop is the cost of solar panels.

Builders and Contractors Take Note: The Move to Make Buildings Healthier is Upon Us

no picture

Vincent J. Mangini, Shareholder in Stark & Stark’s Real Estate, Zoning & Land Use Group, authored the article, Builders and Contractors Take Note: The Move to Make Buildings Healthier is Upon Us, for the October 2011 edition of Mercer Business Magazine.

When construction a new building, contractors should ensure that the facility is sturdy, functional and safe. However, some materials and products used in building design and construction are not. Due to this fact, government agencies and non-profit organizations have recently expressed concerns over the chemicals used in construction and their impact upon the public health.

The Installation of a Solar Energy Facility Presents a Myriad of Legal Issues

no picture

In New Jersey, solar energy facilities have become very popular, especially among businesses and residential property owners, making our State second only to California on the national stage for total solar installations. According to the 2011 Draft Energy Master Plan released by the Christie Administration this past June, there are approximately 9,000 solar photovoltaic projects within the State and most of these are located on commercial and residential sites. Specifically, as of February 28, 2011, in terms of installed capacity, commercial and residential solar projects produced approximately 240 megawatts of power and accounted for 82% of all projects statewide (with most of the remaining 51 megawatts being installed on government sites, school properties and farmland).
 

The drive by commercial establishments and property owners to offset conventional power sources with solar energy certainly comports with current State and federal energy policies.  However, the construction and operation of a solar energy facility may involve a myriad of legal issues for which the advice and counsel of a knowledgeable attorney is essential.
 

Broadly speaking, businesses and individuals interested in hosting a solar energy facility on their premises may do so either by purchasing the solar panels and related equipment outright from a solar developer pursuant to an engineering, procurement and construction contract (EPC) or by leasing the facility long-term (usually 15 to 20 years) pursuant to a power purchase agreement (PPA).  Under both types of agreements, the solar developer may offer to design, build and maintain the solar facility.
 

One threshold matter that applies equally to EPC and PPA contracts is whether to obtain a solar feasibility study for the subject property and the proposed system equipment from an independent technical professional in consultation with an attorney. A solar developer will often perform a property and equipment analysis prior to installing the facility. However, the solar developer’s feasibility study may not include everything that a commercial enterprise or property owner may want to know before committing to the purchase or rental of a solar energy facility. For example, in order for a solar energy facility to operate efficiently and productively the owner or lessee of the system may need to prune or remove trees on site or may need to secure a solar easement from a neighboring property owner to restrict the location and/or height of a building addition, landscaping or other improvements (which might otherwise block access to sunlight).
 

A solar feasibility study should also gauge whether the proposed system size will adequately serve current energy needs (as well as any anticipated change thereto that might occur in the future) and whether the roof of the existing building where the proposed facility is to be constructed and all other structural components and the electrical system can handle the load of the proposed facility. In this regard, by way of further due diligence following receipt of a solar feasibility study, a prospective owner or lessee of a solar energy system should (1) verify with its insurance agent that the proposed facility will not require an insurance upgrade; and (2) contact all companies that have supplied warranties for the roof or other building components that the proposed facility will not require any special inspections to avoid invalidation of any such warranties.
 

Another consideration integral to both EPC and PPA contracts is the procurement of land development approvals and permits for the solar installation.  Indeed, it should not be assumed that the solar developer will obtain any required land development approvals, such as site plan or variance relief (although often they will secure the building permit) or that any failure to acquire such approvals will operate to terminate an agreement with a solar developer.  Therefore, during contract negotiations, a prospective purchaser or lessee should discuss with the solar developer and resolve such matters as which party will be responsible to make application and pay for approvals or permits and whether a failure to obtain any such approvals or permits after making a good faith effort shall operate to terminate the contract.
 

The foregoing represents just a handful of the issues that may come into play when considering whether to install and operate a solar energy system.  If you are interested in learning more about EPC or PPA contracts or have a legal issue relating to solar installations that you would like to discuss, do not hesitate to contact Vincent J. Mangini, Shareholder and LEED Accredited Professional BD+C, here in our Lawrenceville, New Jersey office.

What is NJR Clean Energy Ventures?

no picture

 Gary Forshner, Shareholder in Stark & Stark's Real Estate, Zoning and Land Use Group, meets with Chris Savastano, Director of Commercial Development for NJR Clean Energy Ventures understand what NJR Clean Energy Ventures is and what type of projects they are familiar with.

What is NJR Clean Energy Ventures? from Stark & Stark on Vimeo.

Recent Trends in the Solar Industry

no picture

 Gary Forshner, Shareholder in Stark & Stark's Real Estate, Zoning and Land Use Group, meets with Chris Savastano, Director of Commercial Development for NJR Clean Energy Ventures to discuss the recent trends in the solar industry.

Recent Trends in the Solar Industry from Stark & Stark on Vimeo.

Governor Christie Conditionally Vetoes Solar Ordinance Preemption Bill

no picture

On June 23, 2011, Governor Christie conditionally vetoed Senate bill S2006, recommending that the bill be amended to delete the entirety of Section 1, which includes all the provisions limiting municipal authority over the installation of photovoltaic solar energy systems on residential property, and to include in Section 2, among other things, a definition of a “municipality’s processing costs” and the term “photovoltaic solar panel.”  The Governor’s conditional veto essentially guts the most substantive portions of S2006 and, as such, the fate of this bill is uncertain. Should the Legislature approve the Governor’s recommendations, the watered-down version of S2006 will do little to facilitate the installation of solar facilities on residential properties and our elected officials will have squandered a golden opportunity to encourage New Jersey homeowners to use renewable energy resources and promote the goals of the Energy Master Plan.

Tags:

What is Needed in Order to Make a Solar Project Work?

no picture

Gary Forshner, Shareholder in Stark & Stark's Real Estate, Zoning and Land Use Group, meets with Chris Savastano, Director of Commercial Development for NJR Clean Energy Ventures to discuss the components needed in order to make a solar project work. 

What is needed in order to make a solar project work? from Stark & Stark on Vimeo.

Different Types of Solar Energy Projects

no picture

Gary Forshner, Shareholder in Stark & Stark's Real Estate, Zoning and Land Use Group, meets with Chris Savastano, Director of Commercial Development for NJR Clean Energy Ventures to discuss the different types of solar projects and how each one works. 

What are the different types of solar projects? from Stark & Stark on Vimeo.

The 2011 Draft Energy Master Plan

no picture

Recently, the Christie Administration produced its draft 2011 Energy Master Plan (“2011 Draft EMP”) in accordance with state law, N.J.S.A. 52:27F-14, the final version of which shall serve as the three-year update to the 2008 EMP. The current draft focuses on myriad ways to foster energy efficiency, promote in-State energy generation and facilitate the creation of a balanced energy portfolio that includes conventional, renewable and new, technologically advanced sources of energy production and storage tempered by a deep and abiding concern for the impact of current and proposed initiatives upon ratepayers and economic development. 

 

A complete description of the entire 2011 Draft EMP and its potential implications is well beyond the scope of this blog. However, one topic treated by the 2011 Draft EMP that warrants brief discussion is biomass and waste-to-energy (“WTE”) production. This is a significant alternative source of fuel, which deserves to be reevaluated by the Legislature in meeting the goals and objectives of the Energy Master Plan. “New Jersey . . . has abundant ‘home grown’ biomass potential[, which] includes both agriculturally-derived fuel, as defined by statute, as well as residential and industrial waste material that is used to produce energy, either directly or indirectly.” Indeed, the Garden State is one of the largest producers of garbage per capita within the United States. However, “[o]nly 17% of that waste is converted into energy by the State’s five municipal solid waste incinerators, leaving the rest as an untapped energy resource.”

 

The Christie Administration stops short of proposing or advocating any substantial new incentives for biomass or WTE. However, it recommends possibly revisiting how sustainable biomass and waste-to-energy are classified under the State’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (“RPS”) in light of price discrepancies between solar renewable energy certificates (“SRECs”) and renewable energy certificates (“RECs”) for other Class 1 and Class 2 renewable energy resources in order to make their development more marketable. 

 

Certainly, our State government has already taken sizable steps to create a market for bio-energy. For example, just prior to leaving office as Governor, Jon Corzine signed legislation (P.L. 2009, c. 213), which is referred to as the “solar farm” bill, that (1) authorizes the installation and operation of biomass (as well as solar and wind) energy generation facilities on preserved farmland for the purpose of generating power or heat, (2) adds to the list of activities protected under the Right to Farm Act, N.J.S.A. 4:1C-1, et seq., the generation of power or heat from biomass (as well as solar and wind) and (3) qualifies biomass (along with solar and wind) energy generation as an “agricultural or horticultural use” under the Farmland Assessment Act of 1964, N.J.S.A. 54:4-23.1, et seq. Although the term “biomass” is not defined consistently throughout the solar farm bill, it essentially refers to “an agricultural crop, crop residue, or agricultural byproduct that is cultivated, harvested, or produced . . . and which can be used to generate energy in a sustainable manner.” 

 

More recently, Governor Christie approved Assembly bill A1052 as P.L. 2010, c.101, which supplements Title 52 of the Revised Statutes, requiring State entities generally to “consider the use of biofuels to replace the use of petroleum-based fossil fuels” and specifically to make such purchases “for heating equipment, or other similar combustion systems, motor vehicles, or other motorized equipment[]” provided that the State entity determines that (1) the cost of using biofuels is either the same or less than the cost of using fossil fuels and (2) the use of biofuels for the purpose in question is reasonable, prudent and cost effective. The term “biofuel” is defined under this new law as “liquid or gaseous fuels produced from organic sources such as sustainably grown and harvested crops including native noninvasive energy crops, agricultural residues and non-recycled organic waste including waste cooking oil, grease and food wastes, sewage and algae.” 

 

The first of these two enactments is noted in the 2011 Draft EMP as a statutory achievement promoting the use of renewable energy. 

 

A complete copy of the 2011 Draft EMP is accessible online. The Board of Public Utilities (“BPU”) has already held two hearings on the 2011 Draft EMP, which took place on July 26 and August 3, 2011, and is scheduled to hold one more on August 11, 2011, at the Richard Stockton College of New Jersey. The BPU will also accept comments on the 2011 Draft EMP through August 25, 2011.

Tags:

Tax Incentives for Renewable Energy Projects

no picture

Renewable energy projects, including wind, solar, biomass, etc., continue to rely upon critical tax and other incentives to be cost effective. In the future such incentives may prove unnecessary but now, during the relative infancy of the renewable energy industry, projects would not proceed absent such incentives.

Federal legislation has been introduced to extend the 30 % tax credits for offshore wind projects past the current expiration at the end of 2011. As the industry matures, costs and efficiency of renewable energy projects improve, but for now if we are to reduce carbon footprint (greenhouse gases), emissions and the geo-political impacts of fossil fuels, these tax incentives continue to be a necessary component of this industry that is creating important job opportunities and reducing energy costs.

Older Entries

August 1, 2011 — How Does Solar Energy Production Work?

July 19, 2011 — Policing 'Green' Marketing Claims: The FTC takes the next step in revising its outdated guides

June 9, 2011 — Blue Roofs and Green Roofs - Regulations and Financing

May 31, 2011 — Solar Ordinance Preemption Bill Comes Closer to Passage

May 24, 2011 — Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization and Job Creation Act of 2010 Provides for Changes to Internal Revenue Code

May 20, 2011 — Commercial Landowners Impetus to "Go Green"

April 26, 2011 — Grants in Lieu of Tax Credits

April 13, 2011 — Credit Against Societal Benefits Charge (A2528)

March 23, 2011 — NJ Superior Court, Appellate Division, Upholds Action by Legislature to Transfer Monies Deposited into Clean Energy Fund to General Fund

March 11, 2011 — Governor Conditionally Vetoes Solar Landfill Bill

February 22, 2011 — Governor Vetoes Bill Affording Low-interest Loans for High Performance Green Buildings

February 15, 2011 — Solar Ordinance Preemption Bill Takes Major Step Forward in New Jersey State Assembly

February 7, 2011 — After Being Overwhelmingly Passed by the Legislature, the Solar Landfill Bill Awaits Action by the Governor

January 14, 2011 — Congress Extends New Energy Efficient Home Credit through December 31, 2011

January 3, 2011 — Still Plenty of Time to Take Advantage of the Residential Energy Efficient Property Tax Credit

December 21, 2010 — NJ Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency Offers Loan Monies for Energy Efficient Upgrades

December 20, 2010 — Solar Panels: A Statutorily Protected Power Substitute

December 10, 2010 — New Jersey Legislature Adopts Law Requiring State Entities to Replace Fossil Fuels with Biofuels

November 22, 2010 — HUD Releases Details on Proposed PowerSaver Pilot Program

November 19, 2010 — New York Resident and Corporation Sue U.S. Green Building Council over Allegations of Unfair Business Practices and Deceptive Marketing

November 11, 2010 — Federal Trade Commission Approves New Regulations for Labels on Light Bulb Packaging

November 1, 2010 — Green Marketing Claims Require Thorough Product Knowledge, Holistic Evaluation of Life Cycle Impacts and Careful Planning

October 22, 2010 — DEP Amends and Supplements Regulations To Facilitate Development of Wind Turbines and Solar Energy Facilities

October 11, 2010 — FTC Sues California firm over Deceptive Green Marketing Claims relating to LED Bulbs

October 7, 2010 — FTC Releases Proposed Revisions to Green Guides

October 1, 2010 — New Jersey Likely to See Proliferation of Solar Farms

September 28, 2010 — Failure to Meet Green Building Protocol Adopted by Statute Could be Evidence of Negligence

September 24, 2010 — Deadline for Submitting Applications under the Clean Energy Solutions ARRA CHP Program Is October 4, 2010

September 21, 2010 — Understanding the Legal Risks When Marketing Green Products - Part 2

September 14, 2010 — Understanding the Legal Risks When Marketing Green Products

September 7, 2010 — Governor Christie Signs Offshore Wind Economic Development Act

September 2, 2010 — Champagne Producers Plan to Reduce Carbon Emissions by Lightening the Weight of Their Bottles

August 31, 2010 — When Negotiating an Architectural Services Contract, Be Sure to Check the Standard of Care Covered by the Professional Liability Policy

August 24, 2010 — FTC Expects to Release Updates to Green Guides Before Summer's End

August 19, 2010 — California Legislature Seeks to Restrict Claims relating to the Degradability or Compostability of All Plastic Products in Advertising

August 12, 2010 — Attention Architects! Don't Forget to Do Your Energy Calculations When Designing for Green

August 4, 2010 — Financial Incentives for Commercialization of Clean Energy Technologies

July 29, 2010 — Being Finicky about Products and Materials Selection Criteria Is Essential to Creating a Genuinely Green Home

July 22, 2010 — Policing Unfair and Deceptive Green Advertising Claims

July 15, 2010 — Identifying the Party on the Project Team Responsible for Green Building Certification

July 9, 2010 — BuildingsNY/Green BuildingsNY Conference - Jacob K. Javits Center

July 7, 2010 — Promotions East Conference - Atlantic City

July 1, 2010 — Managing Risk in Green Building Contracts

June 17, 2010 — Coordinating Green Building Design Goals with Historic Preservation

June 7, 2010 — Hot and Green Legal Topics: Round 2

June 3, 2010 — Developing Interior Fit-out Guidelines for Tenant Spaces in Green Building

May 28, 2010 — BPU's Office of Clean Energy Temporarily Suspends Acceptance of Applications for Home Performance with EnergyStar Program

May 20, 2010 — Green Building Performance Goals - Defining and Setting Consumer Expectations

May 17, 2010 — New Jersey's Renewable Energy Incentive Program

May 13, 2010 — NJ Energy Star Homes Program Offers Builders Generous Financial Incentives

May 6, 2010 — Bill Extending New Energy Efficient Home Credit through December 31, 2010 Awaits Reconciliation and Signature by President

April 30, 2010 — New Law Prohibits Inclusion of Solar Panels in Calculation of Impervious Coverage

April 27, 2010 — Economic Development Authority - NJ PACE

April 22, 2010 — Updates to the Federal Trade Commission's "Green Guides" May Impact Building Industry

March 2, 2010 — A Primer on Green Leases: Special considerations that permeate the negotiation process

February 24, 2010 — High Demand on Water Supply May Require Plan for Reclamation and Reuse

February 16, 2010 — A Renewable Energy Facility May Require an Easement from your Neighbor

February 8, 2010 — Governor Corzine Signs Bill Creating Solar and Wind Energy Commission

February 4, 2010 — Governor Corzine Signs Solar Farm Bill

January 6, 2010 — New Jersey Clean Energy Program: Pay for Performance

December 21, 2009 — New York State Energy and Development Authority to provide loans for Energy Audits and Qualified Energy Efficiency Services under Green Jobs-Green New York Program

May 14, 2009 — Stark & Stark Shareholder Serves as Panelist for New Jersey Law Journal Green Building in New Jersey Roundtbale Discussion

April 17, 2009 — Governor Corzine Signs Residential Development Solar Energy Systems Act Into Law

November 19, 2008 — Going Green Should Not Increase You Tax Obligations

October 30, 2008 — Legislative Initiatives in Green Building Arena Abound

October 10, 2008 — Going Green - Here to Stay or Gone Tomorrow?

October 1, 2008 — Proposed Legislation Would Allow Energy Subcode To Be More Restrictive Than National Model Codes

August 7, 2008 — Green Buildings and Environmental Sustainability - Master Plan Element

August 5, 2008 — Inherently Beneficial Uses - Wind, Solar and Photovoltaic Energy Facilities