<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Franchise - New Jersey Law Blog</title>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/articles/business-corporate/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:00:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:49:28 -0500</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>How Do I Franchise My Business</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1012552.html">Adam J. Siegehleim</a>, member of Stark &amp; Stark&rsquo;s <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1009362.html">Franchise</a> group, has created a short web video entitled <em>How to Franchise Your Business In Plain English</em>. The video, inspired by CommonCraft, explains the step-by-step process of turning your business into a successful franchise system.<em> How to Franchise Your Business in Plain English</em> was first shown to the attendees of the 2009 Franchise &amp; Financing Expo in Boston, Massachusetts June 6-7, 2009.&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 10px; font-family: Cambria; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; min-height: 14px;">&nbsp;</p>
<object height="300" width="400">
<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" />
<param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5110827&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed height="300" width="400" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5110827&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/5110827">How To Franchise Your Business In Plain English</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user1319205">Stark &amp; Stark</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/06/articles/franchise/how-do-i-franchise-my-business/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/06/articles/franchise/how-do-i-franchise-my-business/</guid>
<category>Franchise</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:00:22 -0500</pubDate>
<author>asiegelheim@stark-stark.com (Adam J. Siegelheim)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Live Interview From The 2009 International Franchise Expo</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This installment of the New Jersey Legal Update podcast is an interview with <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1012552.html">Adam J. Siegelheim</a>, member of Stark &amp; Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1009362.html">Franchise</a> group, and Bruce Bloom, President of <a href="http://www.bloom-associates.net/">Bloom &amp; Associates, Inc. </a>The interview took place at the 2009 International Franchise Expo in Washington, DC. Mr. Siegelheim and Mr. Bloom discuss preventative measures franchisors can implement in order to prevent a crisis from occurring in these difficult economic times and tips on crisis management, in the event a crisis does occur. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>You can listen to the full podcast online <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/uploads/file/NJ_Legal_Update-78(09_04_01).mp3">here</a>. (5.5 MB)<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/04/articles/franchise/live-interview-from-the-2009-international-franchise-expo/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/04/articles/franchise/live-interview-from-the-2009-international-franchise-expo/</guid>
<category>Franchise</category><category>Podcasts</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 08:00:11 -0500</pubDate>
<author>asiegelheim@stark-stark.com (Adam J. Siegelheim)</author>
<enclosure url="http://www.njlawblog.com/uploads/file/NJ_Legal_Update-78(09_04_01).mp3" length="5761908" type="audio/mpeg" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Live Interview From The International Franchise Association&apos;s 2009 Annual Convention</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This installment of the New Jersey Legal Update podcast is an interview with <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1012552.html">Adam J. Siegelheim</a>, member of Stark &amp; Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1009362.html">Franchise</a> group, and Darrell Johnson, President and CEO of <a href="http://www.frandata.com/">FRANdata</a>, at the International Franchise Association's 2009 Annual Convention in San Diego, California. Mr. Siegelheim and Mr. Johnson discuss the economic outlook for 2009 and for years to come in relation to franchising in the wake of the current economic downturn. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>You can download the full podcast <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/uploads/file/NJ_Legal_Update-77(09_03_03).mp3">here</a>. (7 MB)<br />
&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/03/articles/franchise/live-interview-from-the-international-franchise-associations-2009-annual-convention/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2009/03/articles/franchise/live-interview-from-the-international-franchise-associations-2009-annual-convention/</guid>
<category>Franchise</category><category>Podcasts</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 08:08:45 -0500</pubDate>
<author>rdeluca@stark-stark.com (Stark &amp; Stark)</author>
<enclosure url="http://www.njlawblog.com/uploads/file/NJ_Legal_Update-77(09_03_03).mp3" length="7411669" type="audio/mpeg" />
</item>
<item>
<title>New Jersey Legal Update Podcast - # 74</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday October 1, 2008 <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1012552.html">Adam J. Siegelheim</a>, member of Stark &amp; Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1009362.html">Franchise</a> group, Nathan R. Greenberg, President and COO of Siegel Financial Group LLC, and Don Johnson, President of Diamond Financial Services met at the IFA's New Jersey Franchise Business Networking meeting to discusses the latest trends impacting the franchise industry.  </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Mr. Siegelheim, Mr. Greenberg and Mr. Johnson discussed the recent economic climate in relation to the franchise industry, and what this will mean in the future for franchisors. You can download the full podcast <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/uploads/file/NJ_Legal_Update-75(08_11_14).mp3">here</a>. (7.7 MB)<br />
<br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/11/articles/franchise/new-jersey-legal-update-podcast-74/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/11/articles/franchise/new-jersey-legal-update-podcast-74/</guid>
<category>Franchise</category><category>Podcasts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:09:58 -0500</pubDate>
<author>asiegelheim@stark-stark.com (Adam J. Siegelheim)</author>
<enclosure url="http://www.njlawblog.com/uploads/file/NJ_Legal_Update-75(08_11_14).mp3" length="8103346" type="audio/mpeg" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Insolvency in Franchise Businesses: Minimizing Risk and Maximizing Recovery Under the Bankruptcy Code</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1010298.html">Timothy P. Duggan</a>, Shareholder and member of Stark &amp; Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1011044.html">Bankruptcy &amp; Creditor's Rights</a> group, will present a seminar entitled <em>Insolvency in Franchise Businesses: Minimizing Risk and Maximizing Recovery Under the Bankruptcy Code</em> in conjunction with the Legal Publishing Group of Strafford Publications. The 90-minute tele-seminar will be held Thursday December 4, 2008 from 1:00 PM - 2:30 PM. </p>
<p><br />
<br />
The seminar will feature a discussion of the weakening economy and it's effects on many franchises, ranging from restaurants to convenience stores to staffing services who are now seeking bankruptcy protection. The Bankruptcy Code addresses how franchise agreements are treated in bankruptcy; however, the Code does not resolve all of the unique issues that arise for franchisors and franchisees. It is critical that franchise counsel develop strategies to anticipate and protect against the fallout from bankruptcy.</p>
<p><br />
This teleconference will highlight key legal issues that arise during a franchisor or franchisee bankruptcy. The program will also offer best practices for creating a franchise agreement in order to protect their respective interests and maximize their recovery under the Bankruptcy Code.</p>
<p><br />
You can access additional information and a registration form <a href="http://www.strahttps://www.straffordpub.com/order/?product-abbr=tlsbbaffordpub.com/products/tlsbba/">here</a>. <br />
&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/10/articles/franchise/event-speaking-engagements/insolvency-in-franchise-businesses-minimizing-risk-and-maximizing-recovery-under-the-bankruptcy-code/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/10/articles/franchise/event-speaking-engagements/insolvency-in-franchise-businesses-minimizing-risk-and-maximizing-recovery-under-the-bankruptcy-code/</guid>
<category>Bankruptcy &amp; Creditor&apos;s Rights</category><category>Event &amp; Speaking Engagements</category><category>Media Placements</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:02:45 -0500</pubDate>
<author>rdeluca@stark-stark.com (Stark &amp; Stark)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>State Committee takes a first look at the &quot;Mobile&quot; Franchise Bill</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/articles/franchise/government-relations/">Bill A2491</a>, which was originally filed in March 2008, was &ldquo;introduced&rdquo; on Thursday October 23, 2008 and then referred to the Assembly Commerce and Economic Development Committee on Friday October 24, 2008.&nbsp; It will likely have a &ldquo;second reading&rdquo; before proceeding in the substantive legislative process.&nbsp; </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Members of the <a href="http://www.franchise.org/">International Franchise Association</a> gave a thorough argument against the bill, despite some tough questioning by the Committee members. I also gave some brief testimony on the technical aspects of the proposed bill. The fight against this bill is just beginning &ndash; and since passage of this bill could have a chilling effect on all types of franchising in New Jersey &ndash; this is a fight the franchising community needs to win.<br />
<br />
&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/10/articles/franchise/government-relations/state-committee-takes-a-first-look-at-the-mobile-franchise-bill/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/10/articles/franchise/government-relations/state-committee-takes-a-first-look-at-the-mobile-franchise-bill/</guid>
<category>Legislative Developments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:06:04 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jmacdonald@stark-stark.com (John E. MacDonald)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Bankruptcy: Who&apos;s next in line?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1012552.html">Adam J. Siegelheim</a>, member of Stark &amp;&nbsp;Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1009362.html">Franchise</a> group, was quoted in the article <em>Bankruptcy:&nbsp;Who's next in line?</em>&nbsp;in the October 2008 edition of <u>Franchise Times</u>. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Mr. Siegelheim comments on the recent trend of franchise bankruptcies among large restaurant systems. Mr. Siegelheim discusses the impacts these recent bankruptcies have had on the franchise industry as a whole, as well as what this could mean for franchisees and franchisors in the future if this trend continues. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>You can read the full article <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/uploads/file/AJS - Franchise Times 10_08.pdf">here </a>(PDF). </p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/10/articles/franchise/bankruptcy-whos-next-in-line/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/10/articles/franchise/bankruptcy-whos-next-in-line/</guid>
<category>Franchise</category><category>Media Placements</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:10:14 -0500</pubDate>
<author>rdeluca@stark-stark.com (Stark &amp; Stark)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>New Franchise Disclosure Laws</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1012552.html">Adam J. Siegelheim</a> and <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1011396.html">Cary S. Kvitka</a>, members of Stark&nbsp;&amp; Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1009362.html">Franchise</a> group, will present a webinar entitled <em>New Franchise Disclosure Laws</em>  in conjunction with the New Jersey Institute for&nbsp;Continuing Legal Education. The webinar will be held Wednesday November 12, 2008 from 12:00 PM - 1:15 PM. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The webinar will focus on the newly revised FTC Franchise Rules, which require that all franchisors provide for certain disclosures to prospective franchisees. Under the new rules, a franchisor is now required to file basic information about the franchisor, the franchised business, and the franchise agreement. Mr. Siegelheim and Mr. Kvitka will review the recent trends in franchise law, and will discuss the impact of the new law on the preparation of disclosure documents, franchise agreements, and state registrations. <br />
<br />
You can access additional information and a registration form <a href="http://njicle.com/seminar.aspx?sid=599">here</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/10/articles/franchise/new-franchise-disclosure-laws/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/10/articles/franchise/new-franchise-disclosure-laws/</guid>
<category>Event &amp; Speaking Engagements</category><category>Franchise</category><category>Media Placements</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:07:02 -0500</pubDate>
<author>rdeluca@stark-stark.com (Stark &amp; Stark)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Mobile Franchise&quot; Act Moves One Step Closer to Passage</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The &ldquo;Mobile Franchise&rdquo; Act has been scheduled for a legislative session on October 23, 2008 at 2:00 p.m. The session will take place in front of the Commerce and Economic Development Committee, Room 9 on the Third Floor of the State House Annex located in Trenton, New Jersey. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/04/articles/franchise/nj-legislature-to-consider-applying-the-franchise-practices-act-to-mobile-franchises/">As I&nbsp;mentioned in a previous blog post</a>: </p>
<p>House Bill 2491 and Senate Bill 1539 of the New Jersey Legislature seek to expand the type of franchises, which are subject to the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. In general, the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act currently applies to franchises where: 1) the franchisor has granted the franchisee a license, mark, trade name, etc.; 2) there is a &ldquo;community of interest&rdquo; in the marketing of goods and services; 3) where the franchisee has established or maintains a &ldquo;place of business&rdquo; in New Jersey; 4) where the gross sales between franchisor and franchisee are more than $35,000 in the prior year; and 5) more than 20% of the franchisee&rsquo;s sales are derived from the franchise. The proposed change in the statute would apply the provisions of the Franchise Practices Act to &ldquo;mobile&rdquo; franchises, in other words, franchises that do not have a brick and mortar location. Under the proposed Bill, a &ldquo;place of business&rdquo; would include a location where the franchisee &ldquo;displays for sale or at which or from which the franchisee sells the franchisor goods.&rdquo; This would include an office or warehouse from which franchisee personnel visit or call upon customers or, perhaps more importantly from which the franchisor&rsquo;s goods are delivered to customers. </p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/10/articles/franchise/mobile-franchise-act-moves-one-step-closer-to-passage/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/10/articles/franchise/mobile-franchise-act-moves-one-step-closer-to-passage/</guid>
<category>Franchise</category><category>Legislative Developments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:00:44 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jmacdonald@stark-stark.com (John E. MacDonald)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Buying an Existing Business -- What to Consider</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1011396.html">Cary S. Kvitka</a>, member of Stark&nbsp;&amp;&nbsp;Stark's<a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1011045.html"> Business &amp;&nbsp;Corporate</a> and <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1009362.html">Franchise </a>groups, authored the article <em>Buying an Existing Business &mdash; What to Consider</em> for the September 2008 issue of <u>Mercer Business Magazine</u>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Mr. Kvitka discusses the risks associated when opening a business - whether it is your first business or you are an established business owner looking to expand into a new market. Mr. Kvitka advises business owners to make sure that the transaction is properly structured, that you&rsquo;ve exhaustively investigated the target business, and that the contract for sale is properly drafted.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>You can read the full article <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/uploads/file/CSK MB 9_24_08.pdf">here </a>(PDF).</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/09/articles/business-corporate/buying-an-existing-business-what-to-consider/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/09/articles/business-corporate/buying-an-existing-business-what-to-consider/</guid>
<category>Business &amp; Corporate</category><category>Franchise</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:08:45 -0500</pubDate>
<author>rdeluca@stark-stark.com (Stark &amp; Stark)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Stark &amp; Stark Attorney Discusses Bennigan&apos;s Bankruptcy</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1012552.html">Adam J. Siegelheim</a>, member of Stark &amp;&nbsp;Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1009362.html">Franchise</a> group, was quoted in the August 18, 2008 <u>NJ&nbsp;Biz</u> article <em>Life After the Sudden Demise of a Known Brand</em>. Mr. Siegelheim discusses the possibility of a company loosing it's brand identity after a parent company files for bankruptcy. This comes in the wake of S&amp;A Restaurant Corp.&rsquo;s, the parent company to Bennigan's, bankruptcy filing late last month. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>You can read the full article <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/uploads/file/AJS NJ Biz 8_19_08.pdf">here</a>. (PDF)</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/08/articles/franchise/stark-stark-attorney-discusses-bennigans-bankruptcy/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/08/articles/franchise/stark-stark-attorney-discusses-bennigans-bankruptcy/</guid>
<category>Bankruptcy &amp; Creditor&apos;s Rights</category><category>Franchise</category><category>Media Placements</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:48:17 -0500</pubDate>
<author>rdeluca@stark-stark.com (Stark &amp; Stark)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>What Franchisors Can Expect in Bankruptcy</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In light of the recent high profile bankruptcy filings of dining establishments such as Bennigans and Steak N Ale, <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1012552.html">Adam Siegelheim</a> leads a discussion with <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1011044.html">Bankruptcy &amp; Creditor&rsquo;s Rights</a> Attorneys <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1010298.html">Timothy Duggan</a> and <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1011985.html">Thomas Onder</a> to outline what franchisors need to understand about the bankruptcy process. <br />
<br />
In this podcast the franchise and bankruptcy attorneys discuss: what happens to the franchise&rsquo;s intellectual property assets; what are the responsibilities of the franchisees; how does the bankruptcy filing impact the restrictive covenants which exist and how do potential third-party purchasers of the system come into play.</p>
<p>You can download the full podcast <a href="/uploads/file/Franchise Bankruptcy(1).mp3">here</a>. (10.3 MB)<br />
&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/08/articles/franchise/what-franchisors-can-expect-in-bankruptcy/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/08/articles/franchise/what-franchisors-can-expect-in-bankruptcy/</guid>
<category>Bankruptcy &amp; Creditor&apos;s Rights</category><category>Franchise</category><category>Podcasts</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:07:08 -0500</pubDate>
<author>asiegelheim@stark-stark.com (Adam J. Siegelheim)</author>
<enclosure url="http://www.njlawblog.com/uploads/file/Franchise Bankruptcy(1).mp3" length="10873503" type="audio/mpeg" />
</item>
<item>
<title>The Franchise Relationship: Trends in the Law</title>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1012552.html">Adam J. Siegelheim</a>, member of Stark &amp; Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1009362.html">Franchise</a> group, was a participant in the June 2008 franchise roundtable for <u>GC Mid-Atlantic Magazine</u>, titled <em>The Franchise Relationship: Trends in the Law</em>. <br />
<br />
The panelists discussed topics related to the franchise industry including a discussion on the difference between a franchise and a license, what are the most common factors in disputes that arise among franchisors and franchisees and tips on how to how handle dispute resolution issues in a franchise agreement.<br />
<br />
You can read the full article <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/AJS NJLJ Franchise Roundtable 6.08(2).pdf">here</a>.]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/07/articles/franchise/the-franchise-relationship-trends-in-the-law/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/07/articles/franchise/the-franchise-relationship-trends-in-the-law/</guid>
<category>Event &amp; Speaking Engagements</category><category>Franchise</category><category>Media Placements</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:08:24 -0500</pubDate>
<author>rdeluca@stark-stark.com (Stark &amp; Stark)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Vermont House Bill Which Would Have Rendered Non-Competes Unenforceable Does Not Pass</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/04/articles/franchise/vermont-legislature-introduces-legislation-that-may-render-noncompete-provisions-in-franchise-agreements/">In a&nbsp;previous blog post</a> I&nbsp;discussed House Bill 790 in Vermont which would have had a substantial negative impact upon franchising in Vermont.&nbsp; It would essentially void non-compete provisions in franchise agreements.&nbsp; </p>
<p>The Bill apparently languished in committee through the end of the May session, which effectively kills it for the time being.&nbsp; The danger of such bills is that they tend to leach into &ldquo;sister&rdquo; states.&nbsp; The demise of the Vermont Bill is a positive development for franchisors and helps strengthen the franchise community in general because it protects the general integrity of franchise systems.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/06/articles/franchise/vermont-house-bill-which-would-have-rendered-noncompetes-unenforceable-does-not-pass/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/06/articles/franchise/vermont-house-bill-which-would-have-rendered-noncompetes-unenforceable-does-not-pass/</guid>
<category>Franchise</category><category>Legislative Developments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:37:39 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jmacdonald@stark-stark.com (John E. MacDonald)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>How To Start A Business</title>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1011396.html">Cary S. Kvitka</a>, member of Stark &amp; Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1009362.html">Franchise </a>and <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1011045.html">Business &amp; Corporate</a> groups, will present a seminar in association with <a href="http://www.scoreprinceton.org/">SCORE of Princeton</a>, Counselors to America's Small Business. SCORE offers free and confidential small business advice to help you build your business from idea to start-up to success.<br />
<br />
<br />
The seminar will focus on what you need to know when starting a business. Mr. Kvitka will discuss:<br />
<ul>
    <li>The pros and cons of the three options: buying an existing business; purchasing a franchise; or building your own business.  </li>
    <li>Intellectual property issues, such as trademark or copyright concerns.</li>
    <li>How to negotiate commercial leases and other vendor contracts. </li>
</ul>
<br />
<br />
You can access additional information, and registration information, <a href="http://www.scoreprinceton.org/workshop.php">here</a>.<br />]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/06/articles/media-placements/how-to-start-a-business/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/06/articles/media-placements/how-to-start-a-business/</guid>
<category>Business &amp; Corporate</category><category>Franchise</category><category>Media Placements</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 08:13:48 -0500</pubDate>
<author>rdeluca@stark-stark.com (Stark &amp; Stark)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>On Franchising</title>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1012552.html">Adam J. Siegelheim</a>, member of Stark &amp; Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1009362.html">Franchise </a>Group, was quoted in the article <em>On Franchising </em>in the May 6, 2008 edition of the <u>Wall Street Journal</u>. The article addresses some of the most common issues facing new franchisors and some new concerns franchisors need to be aware of before starting a franchise of their own. Mr. Siegelheim comments on some of the factors that franchisors need to take into consideration when starting a new franchise, and some tips to ensure the longevity of your franchise concept. <br />
<br />
You can read the full article on the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121004434452770011.html?mod=hpp_us_entrepreneur">Wall Street Journal Online</a> (registration required).]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/05/articles/media-placements/on-franchising/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/05/articles/media-placements/on-franchising/</guid>
<category>Franchise</category><category>Media Placements</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 08:39:53 -0500</pubDate>
<author>rdeluca@stark-stark.com (Stark &amp; Stark)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>NJ Legislature to Consider Applying the Franchise Practices Act to &quot;Mobile&quot; Franchises</title>
<description><![CDATA[House Bill 2491 and Senate Bill 1539 of the New Jersey Legislature seek to expand the type of franchises, which are subject to the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act.  In general, the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act currently applies to franchises where: 1) the franchisor has granted the franchisee a license, mark, trade name, etc.; 2) there is a &ldquo;community of interest&rdquo; in the marketing of goods and services; 3) where the franchisee has established or maintains a &ldquo;place of business&rdquo; in New Jersey; 4) where the gross sales between franchisor and franchisee are more than $35,000 in the prior year; and 5) more than 20% of the franchisee&rsquo;s sales are derived from the franchise.  The proposed change in the statute would apply the provisions of the Franchise Practices Act to &ldquo;mobile&rdquo; franchises, in other words, franchises that do not have a brick and mortar location.  Under the proposed Bill, a &ldquo;place of business&rdquo; would include a location where the franchisee &ldquo;displays for sale or at which or from which the franchisee sells the franchisor goods.&rdquo;  This would include an office or warehouse from which franchisee personnel visit or call upon customers or, perhaps more importantly from which the franchisor&rsquo;s goods are delivered to customers.  <br />
<br />
<br />
Potentially more significant than the proposed changes to the definition of &ldquo;place of business&rdquo; is the additional language that the Bill would tack on to the &ldquo;general purpose&rdquo; section of the Franchise Practices Act.  The proposed Bill would add the following language: <br />
<br />
<blockquote>&ldquo;&hellip;and to protect franchisees from unreasonable termination by franchisors that may result from a disparity of bargaining power between national and regional franchisors and small franchisees.  The legislature finds that these protections are necessary to protect not only retail businesses, but also wholesale distribution franchisees that &ldquo;through their efforts&rdquo; enhance the reputation and goodwill of franchisors in this State.  Further, the legislature declares that the courts have in some cases more narrowly construed the Franchise Practices Act then was intended by the legislature&rdquo;.  <br />
</blockquote><br />
<br />
This additional language should concern franchisors doing business in New Jersey, since it is unnecessary to achieve the expansion to the &ldquo;place of business&rdquo; definition that is the focus of the Bill.  This tougher language may indicate that there are further changes to the statute being considered.  Certainly, the inclusion of the proposed language would be used as a justification by judges to give much broader application to the Act than has been the case in years past.  <br />
<br />
<br />
The two Bills are currently in the initial stage of the legislative process, and will probably not be acted upon until May or June of this year.  The current sponsors of the two Bills are Assemblyman Joseph Cryan &ndash; District 20 (Union County) and Senator Bob Smith &ndash; District 17 (Middlesex and Somerset Counties).  The legislation was introduced in the House on March 10, 2008, and in the Senate of March 17, 2008.  <br />]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/04/articles/franchise/nj-legislature-to-consider-applying-the-franchise-practices-act-to-mobile-franchises/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/04/articles/franchise/nj-legislature-to-consider-applying-the-franchise-practices-act-to-mobile-franchises/</guid>
<category>Franchise</category><category>Legislative Developments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:09:33 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jmacdonald@stark-stark.com (John E. MacDonald)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Vermont Legislature Introduces Legislation That May Render Non-Compete Provisions in Franchise Agreements</title>
<description><![CDATA[The Vermont legislature introduced House Bill No. 790 on February 1, 2008.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>The Bill would render non-compete provisions  of franchise agreements void unless the franchisor can prove to the Court&rsquo;s  satisfaction that the franchise agreement is:<span style="">&nbsp;  </span>(1) consistent with public policy; (2) necessary to protect the  franchisor; (3) not a contract of adhesion; and (4) reasonable considering the  subject matter and conditions.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Clearly  the third requirement is problematic.<span style="">&nbsp; </span><br />
<br />
<br />
A  &ldquo;contract of adhesion&rdquo; is legal-speak for &ldquo;non-negotiable&rdquo; and is  &ldquo;take-it-or-leave-it&rdquo; in nature.&nbsp;<span style=""><span style=""> </span>Most franchise agreements are non-negotiable  because it is important for the system to maintain uniform and consistent  standards.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>However, various courts have  deemed franchise agreements to be contracts of adhesion because of the superior  bargaining power of the franchisor. <span style="">&nbsp;</span>Since most franchise agreements are contracts  of adhesion, and if this Bill passes, it will be extraordinarily difficult for  franchisors to enforce non-competition agreements among franchisees in  Vermont.<span style="">&nbsp; </span><br />
<br />
<br />
One can only hope that this  idea does not spread beyond the borders of the Green Mountain State.<span style="">&nbsp; </span><span style="">&nbsp;</span><span style="">&nbsp;</span>Vermont&rsquo;s legislature appears intent of  following this strange course of action, which is out of step with the other  states.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Watch this log for more updates.</span>]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/04/articles/franchise/vermont-legislature-introduces-legislation-that-may-render-noncompete-provisions-in-franchise-agreements/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/04/articles/franchise/vermont-legislature-introduces-legislation-that-may-render-noncompete-provisions-in-franchise-agreements/</guid>
<category>Franchise</category><category>Legislative Developments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:05:26 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jmacdonald@stark-stark.com (John E. MacDonald)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Two Stark &amp; Stark Attorneys Named Legal Eagles in Franchise</title>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1012640.html">Rachel Lilienthal Stark</a>, Shareholder in Stark &amp; Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1009362.html">Franchise </a>group, and <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1012552.html">Adam J. Siegelheim</a>, member of Stark &amp; Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1009362.html">Franchise </a>group, have been named Legal Eagles in the franchise industry by <u>Franchise Times Magazine</u>. <br />
<br />
<br />
Legal Eagles are chosen annually from hundreds of nominations across the country. Legal Eagles are recognized for their strong reputations among their peers, an active involvement in the franchise community through organizations such as the International Franchise Association and the American Association of Franchisors, and their experience and expertise in the franchise industry. <br />
<br />
<br />
Rachel Lilienthal Stark concentrates her practice in the representation of start-up and emerging franchisors on a variety of issues including compliance with all federal and state regulations, disclosure documents, acquisitions and financing. <br />
<br />
<br />
Adam J. Siegelheim focuses his practice in the representation of franchisors in various matters, including the preparation of disclosure documents, state registrations, and compliance with applicable federal and state regulations. Mr. Siegelheim is a member of the International Franchise Association, the American Bar Association Forum on Franchising and the New Jersey Bar Association's Franchise Law Committee.]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/04/articles/media-placements/two-stark-stark-attorneys-named-legal-eagles-in-franchise/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/04/articles/media-placements/two-stark-stark-attorneys-named-legal-eagles-in-franchise/</guid>
<category>Franchise</category><category>Media Placements</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 08:01:10 -0500</pubDate>
<author>rdeluca@stark-stark.com (Stark &amp; Stark)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>New Jersey Legal Update - Podcast # 73</title>
<description><![CDATA[This week's Franchise Law podcast is an interview with the <a href="http://www.huntingtonfranchise.com ">Vice President of Franchisee Development for Huntington Learning Center, Tom Spadea</a>. The interview took place at February's 2008 International Franchise Association's Annual Convention in Orlando, Florida and discusses franchise development and recruitment strategies, the new Franchise Disclosure Document, and a discussion on how to train your employees on policy and procedure updates. <br />
<br />
<p>This week's Franchise Law Podcast is presented by&nbsp; <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1012552.html">Adam J. Siegelheim</a> of Stark &amp; Stark's <a href="http://www.stark-stark.com/attorney-lawyer-1009362.html">Franchise </a>group.<br />
</p>
You can download the New Jersey Legal Update podcast #73 <a href="http://www.njlawblog.com/NJ_Legal_Update-73(08.03.14)(1).mp3">here</a> (8.6 MB)<br />]]></description>
<link>http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/03/articles/franchise/new-jersey-legal-update-podcast-73/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlawblog.com/2008/03/articles/franchise/new-jersey-legal-update-podcast-73/</guid>
<category>Franchise</category><category>Podcasts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:07:04 -0500</pubDate>
<author>asiegelheim@stark-stark.com (Adam J. Siegelheim)</author>
<enclosure url="http://www.njlawblog.com/NJ_Legal_Update-73(08.03.14)(1).mp3" length="9043657" type="audio/mpeg" />
</item>


</channel>
</rss>