Conscientious Employee Protection Act

Posted on December 22, 2004 by Thomas B. Lewis
no picture
  • Email This
  • Print
  • Comments
  • Share Link
Norris v. Harte-Hanks, Inc., et al.

The Third Circuit ruled that Pennsylvania employment law, not New Jersey's, governs in diversity action brought in New Jersey. The plaintiff was employed in Pennsylvania, even though she performed some work in New Jersey, lived in New Jersey, and claimed wrongful discharge based on whistle-blowing about alleged fraud committed by a subcontractor in New Jersey.

Tags:
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.