Tax Assessments

no picture
Sumo Property Management, L.L.C. v. City of Newark

In this matter, the taxpayer alleged assessment discrimination for the years 1997-2002 and claimed that the City of Newark's tax assessor and corporate counsel wrongfully denied it the right to enter into a tax abatement/exemption agreement since the city determined the property was neither a commercial nor industrial property located within an area designated as in need of redevelopment.

The court agreed with the City of Newark's assertion that, regardless of whether the property met the requirements for abatement or exemption under the ordinance, the taxpayer's motion must be denied because the Mayor and City Council have not decided the issue, and, therefore, the motion is not ripe for decision.

Since there was no "municipal action", the matter was remanded to the Mayor and Council for disposition of the pending application within 60 days.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.njlawblog.com/admin/trackback/24732
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.